User talk:Gaborhor

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The article Krauthammer has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:49, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Contents 1 Orphaned non-free media (Image:Krauthammer logo.jpg) 2 Krauthammer 3 Orphaned non-free media (Image:Krauthammer logo1.gif) 4 Orphaned non-free media (Image:Krauthammer.gif)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Krauthammer logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Krauthammer logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 10:05, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Krauthammer

A bot will probably readd the text, and warn you not to blank pages. If you want the page deleted add {{db-author}} to the top, and it will be deleted shortly. Ctjf83^talk 21:02, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Since you blanked the page, I deleted it. But if you want to work on the article a bit before it is ready for "prime time" the common solution is for it to be moved to a subpage of your user page (for instance User:Gaborhor/Krauthammer), which will keep the revision history intact. Let me know if you'd like me to switch to that solution. Mangojuice^talk 21:51, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Ok, it's done. Mangojuice^talk 19:06, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

IMO you're not quite ready yet. You should look for some more reliable independent sources. But my opinion isn't everything, surely it won't be speedy deleted if you move it back now. Just click on the "Move" tab along the top of your browser window, while viewing the draft page, and enter "Krauthammer" as the target. Mangojuice^talk 20:23, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

I didn't have any neutrality problems to begin with, that was another user. The neutrality looks fine to me. I would put the history as one paragraph, it doesn't need to be split up cause each decade only has a sentence or two. Also references need to be put in the paragraph where they are referencing, and then when you do it right, it will show up in the references section. If you need help with this, let me know and I will be glad to help you! I would add more about the company, the more you add, the better. Any questions, just ask! Ctjf83^talk 21:08, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

The first reference needs to be fixed. It should link to the exact page, not just the website in general. Also the references are minimally exceptable. I mean they are fine, but they really are suppose to include the access date, the publisher, such as the company, or the newspaper it was found in, etc, and the title of the article. The more references the better also. Do you have any more references for the history section, such as a reference for the founding date and the founder? You also need to clean up those external links. They are for important sites related to the company, such as their home page, not news articles related to the company. Check out Wikipedia:External links for more help on external links. Other than that, it looks good, contact me when you've fixed those, and I'll look at it again! :) Ctjf83^talk 21:40, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

It looks good to me! go ahead, using the "move" button at the top, and move it to it's own page on wiki Ctjf83^talk 20:00, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Krauthammer logo1.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Krauthammer logo1.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 01:37, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Krauthammer.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Krauthammer.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 01:47, 12 February 2008 (UTC)