Talk:Fashion police
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the Fashion WikiProject. Please work to improve this article, or visit our project page to find other ways of helping. Thanks! |
||
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale. |
||
| High | This article is on a subject of High-importance within fashion. | ||
|
Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
|||
[edit] If it was transwikied, then why is it still here?
I am not being snarky, I just am asking because I don't understand. Both WT and WP have entries named "fashion police", and WP's is lengthier and more detailed (as one would expect in general with WT-WP sister entries). Did subsequent edits to WP:Fashion_police defeat the purpose of the transwiki effort? Or is it OK to grow a new entry where an earlier incarnation had been transwikied? Lumbercutter 23:15, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
- I have no idea how this process actually works, but it seems to me that it would make sense that just because a word or phrase gets defined at WT does not make a WP article about the concept superfluous... for example, listing, say, gypsum at WT doesn't mean WP shouldn't still have an article about its mining and manufacturing. -- Akb4 23:25, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] cites needed
There used to be a bunch of folks who came to the Disclave SF convention in Maryland in the early 90s and did a fashion police schtick, issuing citations that looked like traffic tickets with a bunch of check boxes listing such offenses as "having it and flaunting it" and "flaunting it without having it". I can't document this, so I won't add it to the article. It's possible that someone with old convention newsletters or zines or meeting minutes could provide documentation. -- Akb4 23:25, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
