Talk:Eurocopter EC 145
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions. | ||||||
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. | ||||||
|
|||||||
 |
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions. | ||||||
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. | ||||||
|
|||||||
[edit] Military History Project?
Just wondering how the EC145 figures into Military History? (Born2flie 13:55, 1 October 2006 (UTC))
- See below: The EC-145 is the basis for the US Army UH-72A Lakota, which was a Commercial-Off-The-Shelf (COTS) acquisition program. Jjvcfi 22:09, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, built solely for missions which any other commercial aircraft can be used for. I don't recall the Bell 206 being tagged by WP:MILHIST. Perhaps it is because the military variant of the Bell 206, the OH-58 has its own article, much like the UH-72 has. --Born2flie 02:50, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was there was no consensus. --Born2flie 03:25, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Merge Recommendation
Support. Like the Hughes 300 redirects to its most current version, the Schweizer 300C, the MBB/Kawasaki BK117 should redirect to the company and model description that currently owns the production rights to the aircraft. Both articles are also stubs and will benefit from the merge.
- --Born2flie 00:31, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support: Due especially to the minimal content of the BK117 page, as there won't be any new production of that model forthcoming. - BillCJ 01:21, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Since the UH-72A Lakota is a EC 145, the merging action should perhaps include this article too or at least include the links Jaypee1 09:35, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- This has been discussed and rejected several times on the UH-72A Lakota talk page. Links should already be included. - BillCJ 00:07, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- Since the UH-72A Lakota is a EC 145, the merging action should perhaps include this article too or at least include the links Jaypee1 09:35, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose - There is enough info in the other article to keep on its own. And why should the non-continuation of a product have anything to do with whether an article will be extended? MadMaxDog 08:03, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose - Oppose merge of MBB/Kawasaki BK117 with EC 145 and oppose merge of EC 145 and UH 72 Chwyatt 19:23, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit] Cruise/ Maximum Speed
This doesn't make sense
Never exceed speed: 278 km/h (150 kts) Maximum speed: 278 km/h (150 kts) Cruise speed: 280 km/h (151 kts)
How can the cruise speed exceed the maximum speed? Doyley 22:24, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
A rate of climb of more tahn 10 m/s seems pretty unrealistic - someone pls check the value of 14... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.156.47.238 (talk) 12:55, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
