ebooksgratis.com

See also ebooksgratis.com: no banners, no cookies, totally FREE.

CLASSICISTRANIERI HOME PAGE - YOUTUBE CHANNEL
Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Terms and Conditions
Talk:Erik Rhodes (porn star) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Talk:Erik Rhodes (porn star)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is part of WikiProject Pornography, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Sexology and sexuality This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
This article is supported by the Sex work task force. (with unknown importance)
Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on July 18, 2006. The result of the discussion was keep.

Contents

[edit] Dedication

Does he have an alias? I wasn't able to find his name credited for the Mandy Moore film "dedication" on IMDB, nor on the movie's website http://www.dedicationmovie.net/--Biggayallison (talk) 19:35, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Survived AfD

I've restored this article, minus the speedy tag, after realizing by reading the talk page that it survived an AfD process, the result of which was "keep". It doesn't seem to have much notability to me, but I respect the result of the process. Please note for the future that if it's desired to delete this article, deletion review is the only way possible. Accounting4Taste:talk 19:49, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

This is wrong... you can renominate for AFD whenever you want. It helps to have a new argument/evidence/reason for the AFD though. After 1.5 years there's really no way to review a close like this... a new AFD is just needed. --W.marsh 00:46, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Quite right, I was mistaken about the policy and should have chosen my words more carefully. Accounting4Taste:talk 01:23, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Penis size

How hung is he for the infobox, anybody know?CholgatalK! 07:50, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] personal life section needs to be reviewed and edited

the newly added personal life section needs to seriously be reviewed and edited. it is HIGHLY biased poorly written and is an obvious attempt at bashing another person. the statements made are obvious attacks on Rhodes character especially some of the more personal facts. while he did state his real name on his blog he purposely omitted his last name for a reason. on top of that whoever has edited the personal life section has made statements that lack validity and cannot be confirmed in the site beginning used as a reference. while Rhodes admits to becoming enraged and even having the police called during one of the arguments between himself and his former boyfriend. the statements of 'blood everywhere' and serious injury upon his former boyfriend are never stated within the blog entry being cited and are therefore libel and should seriously be edited. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stellrmn (talkcontribs) 04:17, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. According to WP:BLP, poorly sourced and biased material should be deleted immediately. I have gone ahead and done just that, but don't feel shy about doing it yourself in the future. -Todd(Talk-Contribs) 11:55, 31 March 2008 (UTC)


aa - ab - af - ak - als - am - an - ang - ar - arc - as - ast - av - ay - az - ba - bar - bat_smg - bcl - be - be_x_old - bg - bh - bi - bm - bn - bo - bpy - br - bs - bug - bxr - ca - cbk_zam - cdo - ce - ceb - ch - cho - chr - chy - co - cr - crh - cs - csb - cu - cv - cy - da - de - diq - dsb - dv - dz - ee - el - eml - en - eo - es - et - eu - ext - fa - ff - fi - fiu_vro - fj - fo - fr - frp - fur - fy - ga - gan - gd - gl - glk - gn - got - gu - gv - ha - hak - haw - he - hi - hif - ho - hr - hsb - ht - hu - hy - hz - ia - id - ie - ig - ii - ik - ilo - io - is - it - iu - ja - jbo - jv - ka - kaa - kab - kg - ki - kj - kk - kl - km - kn - ko - kr - ks - ksh - ku - kv - kw - ky - la - lad - lb - lbe - lg - li - lij - lmo - ln - lo - lt - lv - map_bms - mdf - mg - mh - mi - mk - ml - mn - mo - mr - mt - mus - my - myv - mzn - na - nah - nap - nds - nds_nl - ne - new - ng - nl - nn - no - nov - nrm - nv - ny - oc - om - or - os - pa - pag - pam - pap - pdc - pi - pih - pl - pms - ps - pt - qu - quality - rm - rmy - rn - ro - roa_rup - roa_tara - ru - rw - sa - sah - sc - scn - sco - sd - se - sg - sh - si - simple - sk - sl - sm - sn - so - sr - srn - ss - st - stq - su - sv - sw - szl - ta - te - tet - tg - th - ti - tk - tl - tlh - tn - to - tpi - tr - ts - tt - tum - tw - ty - udm - ug - uk - ur - uz - ve - vec - vi - vls - vo - wa - war - wo - wuu - xal - xh - yi - yo - za - zea - zh - zh_classical - zh_min_nan - zh_yue - zu -