Electro-Motive Diesel
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Electro-Motive Diesel, Inc. | |
---|---|
Type | Private |
Founded | Cleveland, Ohio (1922) |
Headquarters | London, Ontario La Grange, Illinois |
Key people | John Hamilton, CEO and President Jerry Greenwald, Chairman |
Industry | Railroad |
Products | locomotives diesel engines |
Revenue | N/A |
Employees | ~2600 (2005) |
Website | www.emdiesels.com |
Electro-Motive Diesel, Inc. (formerly the Electro-Motive Division of General Motors Corporation) is currently the world's second largest builder of railroad locomotives in terms of overall sales. General Electric is the largest, overtaking EMD in the mid-1980s, and between them they have built the overwhelming majority of the locomotives in service in North America and a large proportion of those in the rest of the world as well. EMD is the only diesel-electric locomotive manufacturer to have produced more than 70,000 engines and has the largest installed base of diesel-electric locomotives in both North America and internationally. Additionally, EMD can lay claim to being the company that ended the dominion of the steam locomotive on the world's railroads, by both producing high-quality, reliable locomotives, and just as importantly (maybe more so) knowing how to sell them.[citation needed]
Contents |
[edit] History
[edit] The early years
Electro-Motive Engineering Company was founded in Cleveland, Ohio, in 1922 by H. L. Hamilton and Paul Turner. The next year, the company sold only two gasoline-powered rail motor cars, one to the Chicago Great Western and the other to the Northern Pacific. They were delivered the following year, and worked well - fortunately for the fledgling company, because the sales were conditional on satisfactory performance. The next year, 1925, the company changed its name to Electro-Motive Company (EMC) and entered full-scale production, selling 27 railcars.
While hardly ever is anyone the absolute inventor of any system, Harold L. Hamilton most probably comes close to being called the "father of the diesel locomotive". In an evolutionary career that led him into that role, he was without doubt the diesel-electric’s guiding coordinator. Starting his railroading career as a fireman on the Southern Pacific railroad, he continued into becoming a locomotive engineer on coast to coast runs on both passenger and freights; eventually becoming a manager with the Florida East Coast Railway. Upon leaving the rails for an automotive marketing position in Denver, Hamilton, aware of early electric propulsion experiments, the needs of railroads, and his most recent exposure to heavy vehicles; soon recognized and integrated the idea of highly more efficient (over steam) internal combustion power with railroading. Financing himself, he quit the truck sales job, set up shop in a hotel with his partner and a designer, and created an initial product in 1923 of what eventually became the successful version of diesel-electric railway propulsion.
In 1930 General Motors, seeing the opportunity to develop the diesel engine, purchased the Winton Engine Company, and after checking the Winton Engine Companys books, decided to purchase its chief customer "Electro Motive Company", which was a rail based company. Advancing from railcars, the company began building multi-car diesel streamliners, for Union Pacific among others. By 1935, GM felt confident enough to invest in a brand new factory on 55th St in McCook, Illinois, just west of Chicago, which is still the corporate headquarters. By the end of the 1930s, EMC had a diesel engine powerful and reliable enough for road locomotive use. The 567, named for its displacement-per-cylinder of 567 in³ (9.3 L), was a two-cycle (or two-stroke) supercharged engine with overhead camshafts and four exhaust valves per cylinder. It was built in V6, V8, V12 and V16 configurations. The new technology found its first uses in glittering prow-nosed passenger locomotives, but EMC's eye was on the meat - freight service. The glamorous passenger services made little money for the railroads; capturing the freight market from the steam locomotive would be the ultimate prize.
The company produced a multi-unit freight locomotive demonstrator, the EMD FT, and began a tour of the continent's railroads to demonstrate it. The tour was an overwhelming success, Western roads, in particular, saw their prayers of freeing themselves from their dependence on scarce, expensive desert water supplies for steam locomotives answered in the FT. By 1940 EMC was producing a locomotive a day and had reached 600 in service. General Motors merged EMC and part of Winton Engine to create the Electro-Motive Division (EMD) on January 1, 1941. All GM locomotives built prior to 1941 were built by the Electro-Motive Corporation (EMC). [Winton's non locomotive products {large submarine, marine, and stationary diesel engines} continued under the title of the Cleveland Diesel Engine Division for another twenty years]
[edit] World War II
World War II temporarily stopped EMD locomotive production - the diesel engines were instead required in Navy ships - but in 1943 production of locomotives restarted. More locomotives were needed to haul wartime supplies. The war, however, was in the end a godsend for EMD; while it was allowed to continue to develop the diesel locomotive and to sell it to railroads, its competitors in the locomotive industry - principally the American Locomotive Company (Alco) and the Baldwin Locomotive Works - were prohibited from any developmental work with diesel road locomotives. They were instead ordered to produce diesel switchers and steam locomotives to pre-existing designs, as fast as they possibly could. This delayed EMD's competition and dealt them what was in the end a fatal blow. By the end of the War, EMD's diesel production was in full swing, with a new improved freight locomotive in production, the EMD F3, as well as new passenger EMD E-units. Baldwin Locomotive was also crippled by it own incorrect belief that people wanted to travel on trains pulled by steam locomotives.
The story of diesel's conquest of steam is better placed elsewhere, but a combination of many factors weakened steam's position and strengthened that of the diesel locomotive, and by the late 1940s to early 1950s, the majority of American railroads had decided to dieselize. While other builders had entered the diesel locomotive field - whether old steam builders like Baldwin, Alco and Lima, or newer competitors like Fairbanks-Morse, also a producer of Navy diesels in the war - EMD's extra years of experience told. Most railroads ordered a few units from several different builders in their first, trial purchase — but the second, volume order more often than not went to EMD. Most of these were sales of its freight F-Unit platform — the EMD F3 and later, the legendary F7 — but their passenger E-Unit locomotives just as quickly replaced their steam counterparts with shiny new EMD E7 and later EMD E8 locomotives. The economic arguments for diesel passenger power over steam were a bit shakier than those for freight service, but it hardly mattered - passenger service was more a matter of rolling advertisements and publicity machines than actual profit by this late date, and what railroad wanted to be behind the times?
In 1949, EMD opened a new plant in London, Ontario, Canada, which was operated by subsidiary General Motors Diesel (GMD), producing existing EMD as well as unique GMD designs for the Canadian domestic and export markets. That same year, EMD introduced a new, revolutionary locomotive - the EMD GP7. Called a road switcher type, its design was that of an expanded diesel switcher, with the diesel engine, main generator and other equipment in a covered, but easily removed, hood (thus the other name for these locomotives, hood units). This hood being narrower than the locomotive, this enabled the crew to have visibility in both directions from a cab placed near to one end. The structural strength in the road-switcher was in the frame, rather than in a stressed carbody in earlier locomotives. The maintenance ease of this new type of locomotive won over the railroads in short order - faster, indeed, than EMD truly expected. With very few exceptions, all locomotives produced in the United States for domestic use since the 1960s have been hood units.
EMD's competition was unable to keep pace. Lima failed first, merging with Baldwin and engine builder Hamilton in Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton or BLH, but the Baldwin-led company didn't last much longer. Fairbanks-Morse, after producing a series of innovative locomotives that sold poorly, left the locomotive field (the company is still in business, in its original markets). Before long, only Alco remained, aided by the industrial might of General Electric, who manufactured the electrical gear used in Alco diesel-electric locomotives. GE itself entered the locomotive market in the early 1950s with the introduction of gas turbine-electric locomotives, and by the late 1950s GE developed its own line of diesel-electrics as well.
The 567 engine was continuously improved and upgraded. The original 6-cylinder 567 produced 600 hp (450 kW), the V12 900 hp (670 kW), and the V16 1350 hp (1010 kW). EMD began turbocharging the 567 around 1959; the final version, the 567D3A (built 10/63 to about 1/66) produced 2500 hp (1860 kW) in V16 form.
[edit] Introduction of the 645 engine
In 1966 EMD introduced the enlarged 645 engine. Power ratings were 1500 hp (1.1 MW) V12 non-turbo, 1500 hp (1.1 MW) V8 turbo, 2300 hp (1.7 MW) V12 turbo, 2000 hp (1.5 MW) V16 non-turbo, and 3000 hp (2.2 MW) V16 turbo. EMD also built a turbocharged V20 that produced 3600 hp (2.7 MW) for the SD45 that was their first 20-cylinder engine. The final variant of the 16-cyl 645 (the 16-645F) produced 3500 hp (2.7 MW).
In 1972, EMD introduced modular control systems with the 'Dash-2' line; the EMD SD40-2 became possibly the most successful locomotive design in history. 3,945 were built; if the other SD40 class locomotives are included, a total of 5,752 were produced. The vast majority are still in service on American railroads. In 1984 EMD's control systems on locomotives changed to microprocessors, with computer controlled wheelslip prevention among other systems.
[edit] Introduction of the 710 engine
EMD introduced their new 710 engine in 1984 with the 60 Series locomotives, although they continued to offer the 645 in certain models (such as the 50 Series) until 1988. The 710 was produced as a 12, 16, and 20 cylinder engine and continues to be in production.
After the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement came into effect in 1989, EMD decided to consolidate all locomotive production at the GMD plant in London, Ontario; a development which ended locomotive production at the McCook, Illinois (commonly called the La Grange plant, after its postal address) in 1991, although the Illinois facility continues to produce engines and generators.
[edit] Introduction of the H-Engine
In 1998, EMD introduced the four-stroke 265H-Engine. Instead of completely replacing the 710 series engine, the H-Engine continues to be concurrently produced with the 710.
The early 1990s saw EMD introduce two new innovations; AC electric transmission for increased reliability and tractive effort at low speeds, and the radial steering truck which reduced wheel and track wear. The decade also saw locomotives increase in power to 6000 hp (4.5 MW) from a single prime mover (16 cylinder 265 H engine), in the EMD SD90MAC-H locomotive.
In 1999, Union Pacific placed one of the largest locomotive orders in history when they ordered 1000 units of the EMD SD70M from EMD.[citation needed] (The firm NOHAB received an order for 1000 locomotives in 1920)[citation needed].
[edit] Present day
2004 saw CSX take order of the first SD70ACe locomotives that are designed to be more reliable, fuel efficient, and maintainable than its predecessor AC locomotive the SD70MAC. This model also meets the stringent EPA Tier 2 emission requirements using the tried and true 2-stroke 710 diesel engine.
2005 has seen the first delivery of the SD70M-2 DC locomotive to the Norfolk Southern, building on the heritage of the work horse SD70M locomotive that has set a new bar for reliability in the rail industry. Like its sister locomotive, the SD70ACe, the SD70M-2 meets the stringent EPA Tier 2 requirements and uses the same engine.
EMD is certified to be in conformance with ISO 9001:2000 and ISO 14001:2004.[1]
[edit] General Motors sells the Electro-Motive Division
In June 2004, The Wall Street Journal published an article indicating that EMD was being put up for sale. On January 11, 2005, Reuters published a story indicating that a sale to "two private U.S. equity groups" was likely to be announced "this week".
Confirmation came the following day with a press release issued by GM. General Motors has agreed to sell its Electro-Motive Division to a partnership led by Greenbriar Equity Group LLC and Berkshire Partners LLC. The newly spun-off company is called Electro-Motive Diesel, Incorporated, which retains the EMD brand that is so widely known in the railroad industry. The sale closed on April 4, 2005.
[edit] Engines produced
EMD has produced the following series of engines:
- EMD 567 — no longer in production.
- EMD 645 — no longer in production.
- EMD 710 — currently in production.
- EMD 265 — "H-Engine"; currently in production.
[edit] Reporting marks
The following AAR Reporting marks are listed for rolling stock:
- EMDX - Electro-Motive Division Leasing
- EMLX - Electro-Motive Division Leasing
- GMCX - General Motors Corporation
- GMDX - General Motors Diesel Canada
[edit] See also
[edit] External links
- Electro-Motive Diesel, Inc. - official company website
[edit] References
- General Motors Corporation (January 12, 2005), GM Agrees To Sell Electro-Motive Division. Retrieved January 12, 2005.
- General Motors Electro-Motive Division (April 4, 2005), Greenbriar Equity Group and Berkshire Partners Complete Acquisition of Electro-Motive from General Motors. Retrieved April 13, 2005.
- Reuters (January 11, 2005), GM to sell locomotive unit this week.
- Trains News Wire (March 3, 2005), EMD's new initials will be…. EMD. Retrieved March 8, 2005.
|