User talk:Ejrrjs
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Minor Edits and AfD
Regarding your edits at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enciclopedia Libre, two quick points. Firstly, I'm of the firm belief that any edit which changes how a page looks (such as putting in a subheading) isn't a minor edit - minor edits are things like fixing up typos and so forth. Secondly and more importantly, putting a subheading into an AfD listing throws the entire page out of whack. There's no need to put a heading marked "comments", since that's what the listing is there to achieve - comments on the proposal that the article be deleted. I'd previously removed the same heading for much the same reason, so if I sound a bit short-tempered please accept my apologies. BigHaz 23:07, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
- See [link] where the subheading "Comments" appeared? Not only did it appear like that in the AfD discussion for "Enciclopedia Libre", it appeared like that for all of the AfD log page, since each discussion comes up as a subheading on the page for that day. Thus, the page was thrown out of whack. I'd also contend that it's superfluous to make a subheading entitled "Comments" anyway since, as I said above, that's what the listing is there for. BigHaz 23:31, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Alfonsín and the Juicio a las Juntas
About that... The choice of words didn't seem right. It sounded as if the whole thing was to be thanked personally to Alfonsín, and as if nothing would have been done without Alfonsín (the former is POV, the latter is also speculation). If you have a source that neutrally explains what Alfonsín did to promote the trials, by all means add it to the article. In fact, the context should be explained better (in case the readers might ask themselves why Alfonsín first sent these guys to trial, and then got the rest to benefit from the impunity laws). --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 10:28, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Hi about your post
Its not even that the article states that is that some people are foolish to except the truth that the articles research had flaws (XGustaX 04:01, 22 August 2006 (UTC))
[edit] Hippolyte de Bouchard
[edit] Pirate Buchar
I'd love to know if your sources do consistently refer to Bouchard as Buchar (which sounds like the spanish-ization of the French surname, anyway). At least in Argentina, I've never heard something like that. Thanks in advance, User:Ejrrjs says What? 22:39, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- Jones' work is the only one to mention the nickname "Pirate Buchar"; tonight when I'm home I'll look to see if he cites his source on this. The most common descriptor is simply "pirate."--Lord Kinbote 23:00, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Sophia & Sophos
Can you help supply the latter, in Greek characters:
- Yours truly, --Ludvikus 01:10, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
---
[edit] On a different spirit...
Just wanted to point you to es:Primer revista Martín Fierro that might interest you. Best, User:Ejrrjs says What? 21:32, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks. Now this is what I still want to be doing. Translated. - Jmabel | Talk 20:51, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Malvinas
I think those first 2 places would need sourcing for any connection to the "Falklands" but I have restored the comment to cover the others, SqueakBox 17:03, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Catalan
Please, translate my comments to english, thanks in advance. Pérez 18:24, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] it means
God!, can we speak our own language? Pérez 19:22, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
- Your translation is a good job, thanks. Pérez 19:41, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] RE: Enciclopedia Libre
You've tagged this article as if it needed sources. It already has them; look at the end of the article. User:Ejrrjs says What? 16:18, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- Those should be inlined, using Citation templates . Specially the "Possibility of a merger" section. --Abu badali (talk) 16:37, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- "The use of Citation templates is not required by WP:CITE and is neither encouraged nor discouraged by any other Wikipedia citation guidelines."
-
- However, I wouldn't mind if you want to go ahead and do it. Best, User:Ejrrjs says What? 19:02, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- Yes, I don't see that as a policy violation. Just as room for improvement. --Abu badali (talk) 19:18, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
-
[edit] Editing
Hello,
Just a reminder referencing to Mariquita Sánchez de Thompson:
When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:
The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.
Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers.--Ohmpandya (talk) 00:58, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Archive
Hello Ejrrs, When creating an archive, please also put : {{archive}} at the top of the page. I have done this for you. --Ohmpandya (talk) 18:57, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
