Talk:Directed verdict
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a quality rating on the assessment scale. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance assessment on the assessment scale. | |
[edit] Merge with Judgment as a matter of law
This has been copied from Talk:Judgment as a matter of law
Whilst the other page is a stub, I think the merge should not take place or be the other way around. The reason for this is largely one of US =! World (check out Wikipedia:WikiProject_Countering_systemic_bias, a rather bad habit which I think many of the legal topics have been slipping into recently). I will remove the tag since there is no supporting argument on the talk page or edit summary. I might support a move to merge the other way around, but I don't feel strongly enough about that. --163.1.165.116 21:21, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Criminal Law vs. Civil Law
Just a side note, directed verdict is not specific to criminal law, yet there is criminal procedure info box thingy on the right side of the page. Directed verdict is practically the same thing as Judgment as a matter of law, and the judgment as a matter of law page does not have the criminal procedure info box on the right. CougRoyalty (talk) 22:33, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
