Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2008 January 19

Apache papa 2.1(Part Scandal) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (restore|cache|AfD)

the article was not identical the article deleted before --Accuse La Banks (talk) 16:10, 19 January 2008 (UTC) Hello, I had discussions with Shoessss and MasterHand about this article. The reason for speedy deletion was that this article is identical to the first article that was deleted. There was a copyright problem with the first article (I got a message from Shoessss about that). I have reedited the article according to your requirements and reposted it. Therefore I request undeletion of the article as I don't agree it was identical to the one deleted previously. Please view talk pages of Shoessss and MasterHand. Thank you --Accuse La Banks (talk) 16:10, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

• Endorse. The deletions of this article and Apache papa 2.1 (Part Scandal) were for WP:CSD#G11, not WP:CSD#G4. Suggest nom work with other editors to work on article in userspace (at User:Accuse La Banks/Apache papa 2.1 (Part Scandal) or similar) before moving to mainspace to remove advertising concerns. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 21:48, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

User:Akanemoto (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (restore|MfD)

Hello, I must need that text. Please restore all pages and revision (under User:Akanemoto). I must need. Thanks. --Akanemoto (talk) 05:28, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

• I think you will need to provide an explanation of what the missing content was and why you need it back. The log for your user page indicates that it has been deleted multiple times by your own request. In the absence of an explanation, I would decline per discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2008 January 3. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:33, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
• As per the previous DRV request, I fear I must ask you to stop wasting everyone's time. You've been told on a number of occasions that Wikipedia is not here to provide you with a free webhosting service, nobody is going to undelete anything unless you can give us a good reason. --Stormie (talk) 10:33, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
• This has certainly reached the point where this is disruptive. Please can someone close this? Spartaz ^Humbug! 12:58, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
• I love my text. Please restore. --Akanemoto (talk) 07:56, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Alicia_Miguel_Schull (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (restore|cache|AfD)

Important under the Fashion Wikiprojects. MonicaCabaski (talk) 03:15, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

• See Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Alicia_Miguel_(2nd_nomination) - this is a hoax. Corvus cornix_talk 03:22, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
• Given this edit to the deletion discussion, I must ask why you are now asking us to undelete this hoax article? --Stormie (talk) 10:39, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
  • MonicaCabaski is a sockpuppet account used by the serial hoaxer responsible for the Miguel article. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 16:12, 20 January 2008 (UTC)