User talk:ClueBot Commons
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is for comments on the bot or questions about the bot.
Report false positives on the false positives page, not here.
Praise should go on the praise page. Barnstars and other awards should go on the awards page.
Use the "new section" button at the top of this page to add a new section. Use the [edit] link above each header to edit that header.
This page is automatically archived by ClueBot III.
ClueBot's owner or someone else who knows the answer to your question will reply on this page unless you request otherwise.
|
 Archives |
|
|
|
|---|---|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[edit] User warning deleted by Cluebot
Hi. Just to tell you that in this edit, Cluebot gave a vandal a level 1 warning, but in doing so it deleted a level 4im warning that I had issued only seconds earlier to the same user. This is a repeat offender who, fresh out of a block, resumed his vandalism. --Blanchardb-Me•MyEars•MyMouth-timed 20:15, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] You're annoying!
I'M TELLING! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.68.58.42 (talk) 04:43, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] "false positive" tool not working
I get a "connection refused" error when using the "false positive" tool.
By the way, what had happened is that I had blanked an article which seemed to contain text identical to something on a commercial website. It's entirely possible that my blanking of the article in question was itself a false positive, but when ClueBot reverts the blanking of suspected copyvio., it should at least leave the {{copyviocore}} tag intact. 69.140.152.55 (talk) 06:52, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] placeholders in articles
ClueBotII was used to create an asteroid article in which placeholders were included in the article: "discovered on [[ ]], [[]] by [[]] at [[]]". Placeholders should not exist in any Wikipedia article. How many other asteroid articles have these placeholders? And can ClueBot please remove these placeholders from these articles. Kingturtle (talk) 18:41, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Issue with ClueBot VI and SUL
see this, which won't exist forever. --Thinboy00 @063, i.e. 00:31, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Correctly IDed vandalism incorrectly listed as "FalsePositives"
Culprit (3RR vandal) listed themself as a false positive, when this is not the case. Cluebot was correct. See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/3RR#User:69.124.40.76_.26_User:Hu02138_reported_by_User:MrPrada_.28Result_.29, User:ClueBot/FalsePositives/Reports#Discussion_3 and User:ClueBot/FalsePositives/Reports#Discussion_4. Thanks. MrPrada (talk) 03:39, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
