Talk:Cliff Warner and Nina Cortlandt

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

WikiProject Television  WikiProject Television Television Portal This article is part of WikiProject Television, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to television programs and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. Assessment comments This article has not been rated for quality and/or importance yet. Please rate the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. WikiProject Soap Operas This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an attempt to build consistent guidelines for articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion. ??? This article has not yet received a rating.

This article was nominated for deletion on 1 July 2007. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

[edit] Cultural impact section

Flyer22's rewriting of the article, especially the addition of the "Cultural impact" section, is really the only reason that the article was not deleted. The version that was nominated would surely have produced a consensus to delete. However, the section still requires cleanup, particularly in three respects:

1. Neutrality. Statements like "a famous American daily newspaper", "a well-respected soap opera magazine", "a popular official soap opera site", and the like do not represent a neutral point of view. Words like "famous", "well-respected", and "popular" must be removed or attributed to a source (see WP:NPOV#A simple formulation). I will take care of (i.e., remove) the most obvious neutrality issues shortly.
2. Original research. Statements like "Cliff and Nina's romance enthralled viewers so thoroughly" and "Perhaps to sum up the public's fascination with the Cliff and Nina romance" are likely original opinions and require rewording to reflect information provided in sources.
3. Avoid trivia sections. Once more pressing concerns of neutrality, attributability, and notability have been taken care of, the section should ideally be de-bulleted and the individual items of information integrated into coherent paragraphs.

-- Black Falcon ^(Talk) 06:51, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

• Thank you for your insight, Black Falcon. I will do all that I can to better this article. Flyer22 07:34, 10 July 2007 (UTC)