Talk:California's 48th congressional district special election, 2005
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject California, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
 |
California's 48th congressional district special election, 2005 is part of WikiProject U.S. Congress, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the United States Congress. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. The options are: "FA", "A", "GA", "B", "Start", "Stub", "List", "Disambiguation", "Template", or "Category." |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. The options are: "Top", "High", "Mid", and "Low." |
| ??? | This article has not yet been assigned a subject. The options are: "Person", "People", "Place", "Thing", and "Event." |
I am very interested in following this election. Unfortunately, very little information is available yet on who the finalists may be and their backgrounds.
Contributors?
This looks like a potentially hot race.
- Maybe in August, when the above comment was written, the race could have been called "potentially hot". It quickly became apparent that Campbell is the "anointed one". --Asbl 20:13, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Nomenclature
I checked the Secretary of State web site (which has jurisdiction above the county registrar of voters), and they use the following nomenclatures
- Special Primary Election
- Special General Election
Check out the calendar PDF files in the Secretary of State web site for the special elections called to replace Campbell in the State Senate http://www.ss.ca.gov/elections/elections_sd35.htm (look at what election day is called).
[edit] One vs. two tables
Although combining the two elections into one table may seem like a good idea as it is more compact, the results of the elections do not allow this compact form, as James Gilchrist received more votes than Steve Young in the first election, but received less votes than Young in the second election. This leads to the dilema of how to sort the table; hence, it's better to have two tables. --Asbl 16:40, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
- Okee-doke.—Mark Adler (markles) 18:09, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
