User talk:Begewe

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Welcome to Wikipedia
Hello, Begewe, and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm AxG, one of the thousands of editors here at Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:   The five pillars of Wikipedia   How to edit a page   Help pages   Tutorial   How to write a great article   Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

[edit] Business process management

Hi Begewe, thanks for making so many improvements to the Business Process Management article. I have a small question about one of your edits. In this one you removed an inline ref. Generally specific, inline references are considered a very good thing on Wikipedia, so I wanted to know if this was a deliberate edit (and if so, what the problem with the ref was) or just a mistake on your part. Thanks, and keep up the great work! -- Siobhan Hansa 21:59, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi Siobhan Hansa, I have no issues with inline references. However in the given case the reference did not make any sense (to me). The ref was meant to support a rather trivial claim: good design is good ... Additionally, the ref was not specific with respect to the claim -- you could basically take almost any academic IS article to support this claim. In general, I think the article is still pretty bad and deserves a major overhaul. I'll see what I can do. Thanks for your feedback! BTW: Where am I supposed to respond to your TALK? On my TALK page or on your TALK page? Begewe 17:39, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi Begwe. I see your point. The original purpose of the ref (see here), appears to have been lost in later edits. Thanks for responding. -- Siobhan Hansa 18:00, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Replaceable fair use Image:Annastacia_Palaszczuk.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Annastacia_Palaszczuk.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 07:38, 22 March 2008 (UTC)