Talk:Assault
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. |
| High | This article has been assessed as High-importance on the assessment scale. |
Contents |
[edit] Definition of Assault in Australia
I believe the definition of Assault in Australia does not require actual violence (ie battery). Assault in Australia only requires the apprehension of violence/contact. Can someone else confirm this so I can change it.
Chuckye 13:35, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
How does this affect sports in Britain, like say boxing? -rmhermen
Well, while consent is not a defence, there is a long list of exceptions to the general rule: such as sports, medical procedures, tattooing... sadomasochism however isn't one of them.. --Simon J Kissane
there's a lovely term in this jurisdiction (New York State) that I've never heard before in America - "menacing". You can do it to someone by shouting at them, I deduce from reading the Police Blotter in my local paper. I suppose (and I know little about the law) it's a descendant of the assault/battery separation in common law.
An explanation of the military meaning of assault is missing. Simon A. 17:43, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
- The solution may be to move this article to Assault (crime), and make a disambiguation page of "Assault" with a link to a comparable military article. -- BD2412 talk 18:38, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
Regarding the physical assault by Ms. Baucus, it was sudden, unexpected, sustained and her punches were quite vigorous. However, she did not use any sort of weapon other than her own hands and fists. Does this help? --Limestone2 07:00, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
Please explain if this is simple assault:
My neighbor put up a temporary netting-type fence along our property line to prevent leaves from my yard from entering his yard. The fence fell into my yard so I took it down. He and I got into a verbal disagreement over it and his wife, who was obvioulsy enraged about the discussion, walked into my yard, placed her hands on me and pushed be back, telling me to quit doing what I was doing.
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Leacorp"
This article does not contradict itself. It is simply a difference in the American "common law" and "modern law".
I agree; unless I see an objection or someone else does it first I'll add a traditional/contemporary distinction and remove the flag.
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Youngjim (talk • contribs) 21:09, 24 December 2006 (UTC).
[edit] Intentional Exposure to Contagion?
I believe there are now jurisdictions which charge those who intentionally expose others to communicable diseases (HIV, etc.) as assault. I've seen several such articles, but haven't found the one I'd read using the term assault. Does anyone else know anything about similar cases? samwaltz 15:56, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- Hrm... well, it's not quite the same, but I just found an interesting new application of the term "assault". Websearch "Brian Bruggeman assault". Bruggeman, an inmate in Lincoln County Jail, engaged in an act of flatulance on another inmate, and was subsequently charged with assault. [1] [2] samwaltz 08:56, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Shouldn't stalking be here as well? stalking link.
[edit] Sexual assault
This article says that in the US and England, assault just refers to the threat, not a physical act. However, the article on sexual assault states that it is physical a physical act. This seems like a contradiction to me. Can anyone clarify this? --W00tfest99 20:03, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Scottish Law
There is a sentence that says "However in Scottish Law, consent is not a defense for assault." However, this is either in the wrong section (it is not under the "consent" section, but rather the next one) or is an incorrect statement. Does anyone know what the deal here is? dantonel 23:13, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] QUESTION:
Are there exceptions or partial defenses if the assault was aggrivated? For example, if the victim continuously called the perpetrator a cunt, dared him to stab, etc? If so what is the law in the United States (And other countries if anybody knows) federal code?
MunkyJuce69 18:12, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wrong about US law:
The article generalizes the entire US by saying the whole country goes by common law when this is not true. It depends on the state. New York for example has the definition of assault as, with intent to cause physical injury to another person, he causes such injury to such person or to a third person;" This is clearly modern penal code, not common law.
alec81484Alec81484 01:46, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Ambiguity
"Assault is typically treated as a misdemeanor and not as a felony (unless it involves a law enforcement officer)."
Does it matter how the law enforcement officer was involved? That is to ask, is it a felony if the law enforcement officer is the accused?
--Crumbinator 00:00, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
