Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Self-dependence
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete--JForget 00:53, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Self-dependence
I mistakenly tried to speedy this for WP:OR which is not a proper reason. My bad. However, this is more an essay/analysis of the poem. I really don't see this becoming a proper WP article. Assuming proper sources could be found to support an analysis, I still think it would be OR. I suspect this is school project. Pigman 00:39, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, original research, and a C-plus on the Grade 9 Language Arts assignment. Accounting4Taste 01:02, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, yes it's a school essay, if barely, and quite incomprehensible at that. I think this could have been dealt with via WP:PROD, if not speedily deleted.Shawn in Montreal 01:05, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
- Comment I admit I consistently neglect to use PRODs in situations where it is obviously the better choice than bringing them to AfD. A lesson I've been trying to learn for a while now. (hammers own head with fist) "Pay attention!! Remember now!! Don't be stoopid!!" Thanks for the pointer. Pigman 02:25, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Not enough usable material for a stub at this point. May be copyvio, too; this web page has the same test, but it was apparently posted the same day as the wp article was created so it's hard to say. --Allen 01:07, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Maxamegalon2000 05:27, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete without prejudice. The poem may be worthy of an article; this is not that article. - Smerdis of Tlön 13:59, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete without prejudice per Smerdis of Tlön, and note to passing admins that WP:SNOW might be applicable here soon... - Che Nuevara 14:24, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as previous two Think outside the box 14:53, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
