The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete.EdJohnston (talk) 02:49, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Non notable business executive, failing WP:BIO. Fair number of hits on google. About 400, but most seem to be social networking, mirrors of zoominfo, couple of bits in newspapers where is is quoted about something HP is doing. Started a company called Oblix in the 1990s (incidentally the name of the article author) and he is currently a VP of strategy and planning at Hewlett Packard. Nothing earth shattering that would seem to make a prima facie case for notability. Montco (talk) 23:39, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Blueboy96 17:57, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
weak keep a google search seems to turn up a bunch of minor mentions, nothing really in depth, so it looks like it might be possible to create an article that passes WP:BIO. The article is also very new. I would err on the side of keeping it for a while longer to see if anyone actually expands it. Wrs1864 (talk) 23:49, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete Quercus basaseachicensis (talk) 20:23, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
