Talk:ANTARES (telescope)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, which collaborates on articles related to physics. |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating within physics. |
|
Help with this template This article has been rated but has no comments. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
|
 |
An entry from ANTARES (telescope) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 11 June 2006. |
 |
Contents |
[edit] ironic?
I admit my error. You can look at my bickering documented in the archive if you really care about it. Teply 22:05, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] sterile neutrinos ???
As far as I know, ANTARES has nothing to do with the search for any sterile neutrinos predicted by string theory. It is definitely none of its official goals. Also, I cannot think of any way a neutrino telescope could be sensitive to anything like that - especially as ANTARES has no true capability to study oscillations (if that is what the author had in mind - the infamous LSND-KARMEN controversy, which has recently been resolved in favour of KARMEN). Please feel free to try to persuade me of the opposite :) GenghisDon 07:53, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
I am going to delete this reference soon, if nobody objects.GenghisDon (talk) 10:40, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Energy Range
In the article, the interesting energy range for ANTARES ist stated as 1E11-1E21 eV. While the lower figure is correct, the upper figure is definitely too high, in particular for any astrophysical models currently in discussion. 100TeV (1E14 eV) is a more reasonable figure, of course barring some very special top-down models. GenghisDon (talk) 15:59, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Call for References
The Article lacks references for quite a few statements. I would be very happy if somebody could add some. GenghisDon (talk) 13:08, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
