Talk:Airmail

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of the Philately WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of philately and stamp collecting. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks or check out the Philately Portal.
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale.
High	This article has been rated as high-importance on the importance scale.

WikiProject Echo has identified Airmail as a foreign language featured article. You may be able to improve this article with information from the German language Wikipedia.

Please see note on Wikipedia talk:Make only links relevant to the context. Viajero 12:56, 5 Nov 2003 (UTC)

---

I've read Italy in 1917 had the first airmail stamp, but I can't source it. Can somebody confirm & include? Trekphiler 11:12, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Yes, it's mentioned in Cabeen, which I added. Stan 15:38, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Hi, I want to know how much time a Air Mail takes to deliver a envelope from Morristown, TN to India Chennai. Thanks —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 121.247.215.210 (talk • contribs).

• You'll have to ask at your local post office. --Firien ^{need help?} 15:01, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mailplane?

I don't personally understand why an e-mail application for OS X, Mailplane is linked from Airmail. I don't think the similar names qualify. - MSTCrow 19:47, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Because someone screwed up a page move, but it is ok now. Had you looked at the history of Mailplane you would have seen the error immediately. Thanks for pointing it out. Cheers ww2censor 10:34, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Translation

What page are you using for the translation? Because it is a draft, it should possibly be here because some integration work is needed before putting into the mainspace. Thanks ww2censor (talk) 17:08, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

The translation page can be found here, which is the usual page for pending translations. I don't know if it is necessary to proofread the finished translation before merging it into the existing article, it would make more sense to proofread the whole article afterwards. — Tirkfl^talk 09:15, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

I would expect we really to have to proofread first, then copyedit to remove or add extraneous information and finally add references before merging with the current article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ww2censor (talk • contribs) 16:40, 7 February 2008 (UTC)