User talk:A Link to the Past

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archives
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Contents 1 Pokémon article 2 Re: Video games noted for negative reaction 3 Archive 4 GAMEFAQS is not a source. 5 I'll show you what I mean so that I wont feel stupid 6 List of Wii games 7 Truce? 8 Chill. 9 It has been suggested that this page be split into multiple pages. Doesnt say remove 10 Im done with you 11 A note 12 I'm sorry lets be friends 13 AfD nomination of List of characters in the Animal Crossing series 14 Comment about your remark towards me 15 Regarding that discussion at WT:ANIME

[edit] Pokémon article

I undid your move of "Pokémon (anime)" to "Pokémon (TV series)" because the article also includes discussion of the Pokémon movies and DVD only specials, which are not part of the TV series. You also stated that "Anime is unnecessarily vague" in your move, but I don't see anything vague about it. "Anime" is Japanese animation, and the article covers all of the Pokémon anime. -- HiEv 23:45, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Video games noted for negative reaction

Sorry about that; I didn't go through the history when I reverted your edit. I saw "big block of text removed" and immediately figured it to be vandalism. I didn't think; my apologies. --tennisman 21:43, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Haha, that's VERY belated. My birthday is in December :P Those greetings are from my First Edit Day, which was ~two weeks ago. --tennisman 21:45, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Hey, there, Mr. rules, here's something you should check out before reverting the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by I am a jedi (talk • contribs) 01:30, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

guess what, it does. quality is how much information it provides minus false info, think about that. I am a jedi (talk) 02:12, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

no sources, then what do you call the "gamespot gave it a this", or, "ign gave it a that", that ends each and every entry? just because you can't see it on the reference page doesn't mean it doesn't exist. I am a jedi (talk) 05:27, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

look, which ever way you want it, ignore or adhere, the article is perfect as is and does NOT need you to say otherwise. i was, of course, saying that we should ignore the rule of putting the sources on the references section, but let the article live as it HAS sources from gaming websites. I am a jedi (talk) 07:15, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Archive

It appears that your archive bot has been deleted, would you like me to archive your talk page manually?--SRX^--LatinoHeat 17:57, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Y Done SRX^--LatinoHeat 18:08, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] GAMEFAQS is not a source.

GAMEFAQS is not a source. please read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources. Also please see the talk page before removing important information.

List of Xbox 360 games

List of Playstation 3 games both don't include your "Australia" and they were not dumb to take out a whole bunch of important information as you did. I believe you live in "Australia" and is pist that they didn't add "Australia" to the list.

If you take it off you will be block. All the other list of game did not add Australia why should the Wii add Australia? just b/c Australia is not on the list doesnt give you the right to mess up the whole page. You need to stop and go back to what you were doing before you decided to come back and mess uup wiki.--Lbrun12415 04:47, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

N64, Atari, NES, SNES, PSX no one plays does anymore people care out games of this generation not the old.--Lbrun12415 05:18, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

IT doesn't matter every one likes it to be Japan, Europe, and North America nothing else many people find it a lot better that way b/c it indeed does have the more popular places and it indeed also has the fastest release dates. unlike other places which it does indeed take to long to get a release date.

Japan, Europe, and North America get games a lot faster then any were else.--Lbrun12415 05:37, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Please see Mario Kart Wii europe got one day after way before anyone else.

[edit] I'll show you what I mean so that I wont feel stupid

List of Xbox 360 games no Australia

List of PlayStation 3 games no Australia

List of PlayStation Portable games the only one that has Australia

List of Nintendo DS games no Australia

List of Wii games The one you messed you and many people are pissed about

List of Nintendo 64 games no Australia

List of Atari 2600 games no Australia

List of Nintendo Entertainment System games no Australia

List of Super Nintendo Entertainment System games no Australia

List of PlayStation 1 games no Australia

[edit] List of Wii games

Simply re-deleting the information is the wrong way to go about this. That's why I proposed an article split to keep the size down and to preserve factual, relevant data. If you could please, explain to everyone why it is that the release dates are not allowed in the article because some of them are missing? Instead of saying "THARS NO AUSTRIA!!1" please come up with an unbiased and sensible point of view. Continuing to act like this will likely get you reported for admin intervention. --AeronPrometheus (talk) 05:35, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Make a note of this: You treat other editors with complete disrespect, you ignore etiquette and come down on others for falling even slightly out of line and you're participating in an edit war with multiple editors who disagree with your rash decision making. Summarizing your words in "childish banter" is right on the money, you need to grow up and learn to work with other people especially when making major changes. As I said before, you're asking for disciplinary measures from more respectable members of the community

Note: I by no means consider myself a respectable member of the community, take a look at my editing history and you'll find I've made the same mistakes in the past. The thing is I recognize those actions as the wrong thing to do, and make efforts to keep from repeating them. --AeronPrometheus (talk) 05:49, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

I have a question: If Australian release dates are so important to you why are you not making an effort to include them? Removing all the other dates because your favorite is missing is a classic "If I can't win, nobody will" attitude. --AeronPrometheus (talk) 05:57, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Aww, do you need help? No, seriously, to help ease the tension I'm offering to help you reconstruct the Australian release dates. Just tell me where a few good resources are and I'll pass whatever I find to you along with the reference for them. Although I think first the article should be split, and discussion should veer towards that end. One in the morning? Then get the hell off your computer and go to bed. I only hope you're easier to deal with after some sleep. --AeronPrometheus (talk) 06:06, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

And don't use my talk page for article talk please. --AeronPrometheus (talk) 06:10, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Truce?

I have never met a person like you before. How does it make you feel that you want to get me blocked after I undid something you did and you are trolling about it. Yes what I said was wrong I undid not b/c I don't want to get blocked BUT, b/c it was wrong for me to say that. And I have said I was Sorry but it seems you want me to be sorry by getting the both of us blocked??--Lbrun12415 05:48, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

UMM maybe you should read what I told her like a few sec ago.--Lbrun12415 05:53, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

When someone puts false information such as something which is not a source I could do as I please.--Lbrun12415 00:28, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Chill.

As much as it seems like everyone is out to disagree with you, getting heated up and making backhand comments like this and losing your cool really isn't getting you anywhere. Your "friend" may not be so interested in having Australia among the regions listed, but by all means it does not mean it can't be done or not able to be resolved amicably. Going for a deletionist view of removing all other release dates because Australia or S.Africa does not get a fair shake isn't helping, so why not try keep a cool head, and request for a compromise, some middle ground? Chan Yin Keen | Talk 06:07, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] It has been suggested that this page be split into multiple pages. Doesnt say remove

It has been suggested that this page be split into multiple pages. (Discuss)

[edit] Im done with you

Please don't comment me back b/c i am indeed done with you, you seem not to understnad what i'm trying to tell, I offered a truce but no, you denined it so good bye.--Lbrun12415 01:01, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] A note

Hi ALP, please don't worry about whether other user's delete warnings from their talk page. I saw it and I'm sure the other admin did as well. It's definitely not worth the trouble and it is against user talk page guidelines. Thanks, R. Baley (talk) 01:21, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Replied at this section on my talk page diff. R. Baley (talk) 02:04, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

I am growing tired of fighting you, Link, just wait for 1 week until nomader finishes his version on his userspace. Besides, I left you a message on the discussion page that you didn't even bother to check out. Plus, I know we go off on the wrong foot, so here's a cookie.

Plesae stop reverting, of the people reading the article, you must think. May the Force be with you, Link, please consider this message of truce.

[edit] I'm sorry lets be friends

How about this we add Asia Pacific and take out the japan one since Asia Pacific covers japan, Australia, New Zealand....etc. please see http://www.nintendo.com/countryselector .--Lbrun12415 22:47, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of List of characters in the Animal Crossing series

I have nominated List of characters in the Animal Crossing series, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of characters in the Animal Crossing series. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Judgesurreal777 (talk) 05:58, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Comment about your remark towards me

Just because the discussion wasn't harming anyone, doesn't mean it should remain. Guidelines don't need to be ignored just because people aren't "harmed". You didn't need to be uncivil towards me, just because I was trying to help. RobJ1981 (talk) 20:40, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding that discussion at WT:ANIME

Aren't you going to change the names of Dragon Ball characters? You were right about consensus, more are indeed in favour of the dub stuff. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 21:35, 10 June 2008 (UTC)