User talk:68.192.27.4

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. /wangi 22:46, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, you will be blocked. DB (talk) 02:10, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. DB (talk) 02:13, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. DB (talk) 02:39, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

1 Warning messages
2 An Automated Message from HagermanBot
3 A page for you to read
4 AMS
- 4.1 April 2007
5 unblock
- 5.1 May 2007
6 Hey!
7 Blocked
8 that does not matter!

[edit] Warning messages

Do not remove warnings from your talk page, as that is also considered vandalism. DB (talk) 02:34, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] An Automated Message from HagermanBot

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 02:18, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] A page for you to read

Wikipedia:What is a troll. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 09:49, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AMS

According to NWA's website, Amsterdam is considered a hub for them. Bucs2004 20:42, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] April 2007

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Randstad, you will be blocked from editing. Meaningful Username 17:32, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:New Jersey, you will be blocked from editing. Michael Greiner 04:04, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy as a result of your repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} . Kuru ^talk 17:37, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] unblock

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "excuse me but i think it is very unjust that you block my son. he has some problems and i understand that he vandalized wikipedia, but it is not fair to him. he has a hard time dealing with these problems and he was not taking his medicine in the past couple of weeks. he will start taking it and everything will be okay."

Decline reason: "Unfortunately, if your son has such issues, he should not be editing Wikipedia. Unblock request declined. - auburnpilot talk 19:56, 21 April 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

[edit] May 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Continental Airlines. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Mschel 01:32, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Continental Airlines. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Bgs022 01:36, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] Hey!

Don't edit! --Juansidious 01:38, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy by continuing to vandalize pages after the expiration of your previous block. The duration of the block is 2 weeks. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org. MastCell ^Talk 01:39, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Request reason: "If you look above, the last time this IP was blocked was by MastCell and that block expired a few days ago. There were NO edits made on this IP since the block expired and yet it is blocked again for a month? How does that make any sense? Another user went on his account on this IP and did vandalise, but there was no vandalism done on the IP! So now when a good user wants to use wikipedia, he cannot because he can't edit on the IP and cannot create an account! So basically, this IP is unblocked then reblocked for a month when no vandalism was made, and no warnings or messages were sent. There seems to be a lost in translation between Luna Santin and this IP adress."

Decline reason: "Per reasoning of Luna Santin below. - auburnpilot talk 03:20, 4 June 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This IP address was blocked following one or more {{unblock-auto}} requests stemming from blatantly abusive accounts, in tandem with a history of repeated and blatant abuse. Users with existing accounts should be quite able to edit -- those in need of accounts can contact unblock-en-l for help registering. – Luna Santin (talk) 03:18, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] that does not matter!

there was one account which got blocked for vandalism after the block expired on this IP! There were no vandal edits made on this IP, infact no edits were made! You blocked an IP for cronic vandalism when there was no cronic vandalism to be had. It is almost like saying once an alcoholic always an alcoholic. So this IP was blocked, does not mean you just go and block it again for no apparent reason! Once a block has expired, then one is aloud to edit on the IP again. And when NO ONE even makes any edits at all, there is no reason to block it again! A user account does not have to do with the IP, it pertains to ONLY the user!--68.192.27.4 03:22, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

AND it is a pain in the neck trying to register with you to create an account when one should be able to do so without going through that on this IP

To request an account, please e-mail the unblock mailing list. Detailed instructions can be found in the message you see when you attempt to edit a page. Riana ⁂ 03:28, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

I do not want to make an account, I want this IP unblocked! There was no vandalism edits made, and it should not be blocked. --68.192.27.4 03:36, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

This IP address has been a persistent source of problems since at least February. I am open to the possibility that helpful users are on this address, hence the open and standing offer to create an account for you. Principle is great, but I'm happily offering to meet you halfway, here, and I'm afraid I don't see how that's an unreasonable offer. – Luna Santin (talk) 03:52, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

But you do not get it! This IP's block just expired. And your blocking it again for nothing? I do not get the logic.--68.192.27.4 21:31, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address.

[WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • Traceroute • Geolocate • Tor check • Rangeblock finder] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean]

See also ebooksgratis.com: no banners, no cookies, totally FREE.