पुरुषोत्तम नागेश ओक
विकिपीडिया, एक मुक्त ज्ञानकोष से
पुरुषोत्तम नागेश ओक (मार्च 2, 1917 - दिसंबर 4, 2007), जिन्हें प्रायः पी. एन. ओक कहते थे, एक भारतीय इतिहास लेखक थे।
अनुक्रम |
[संपादित करें] जीवनी
यह पृष्ठ किसी और भाषा में लिखा गया है। आप इसका अनुवाद करके विकिपीडिया की मदद कर सकते हैं। 
According to the introduction of one of P. N. Oak's books, he was born in Indore, Madhya Pradesh. During World War II he joined the Indian National Army, which fought with the Japanese against the British. He obtained M.A and L.L.B degrees from Mumbai University. From 1947 to 1953 he was a reporter for the The Hindustan Times and The Statesman newspapers. From 1953 to 1957, he worked in India's Central Radio and Public Ministry. From 1959 to 1974, he worked at the American Embassy in New Delhi.[१]
[संपादित करें] Revisionist theories
Intent on rectifying what he believes to be "biased and distorted versions of India's history produced by the invaders and colonizers", Oak has written several books and articles on Indian history and founded the Institute for Rewriting Indian History on June 141964. According to Oak, modern secular and Marxist historians have fabricated "idealized versions" of India's past and drained it of its Vedic context and content. Oak's work typically seeks to proclaim the virtues and achievements of Hindu culture and religion over other traditions.
While Oak's theories have been publicized by some contemporary Hindutva adherents,[२][३] none of Oak's assertions have been accepted by mainstream scholars of religious and architectural history. Edwin Bryant writes that most academics would consider him a 'crackpot'.[४] Art historian Rebecca Brown describes Oak's books as "revisionist history as subtle as Captain Russell's smirk" (referring to a character in the Hindi movie Lagaan).[५]
[संपादित करें] Taj Mahal and other medieval Islamic monuments
मुख्य लेख: ताजमहल: एक सत्य कथाIn his book Taj Mahal: The True Story, Oak claims that the Taj Mahal was originally a Shiva temple or a Rajput palace seized by Shah Jahan and adopted as a tomb.
The Taj, Oak says, is a "typical illustration of how all historic buildings and townships from Kashmir to Cape Comorin though of Hindu origin have been ascribed to this or that Muslim ruler or courtier".[६] He goes on to propose Hindu origins for the tombs of Humayun, Akbar and Itmiad-u-Dallah and "all historic buildings" in India as well as the Vatican,[७] the Kaaba and Stonehenge.
Oak's denial of Islamic architecture in India has been described as one of the "more extreme manifestations of anti-Muslim sentiment" in Maharashtrian popular culture.[८] K. N. Panikkar locates Oak's work in the Hindu nationalist attempt to foster a communal understanding of Indian history[९]. Tapan Raychaudhuri has referred to him as "a 'historian' much respected by the Sangh Parivar."[१०]
Oak claims that Hindu ornaments and symbols were effaced from the Taj, whose sealed chambers hold the remnants, including a Shiva Lingam, of the original temple and that Mumtaz Mahal was not buried at her cenotaph.
In support of these claims, Oak presents carbon dating results of the wood from the riverside doorway of the Taj, quotes from European travellers' accounts and the Taj's Hindu architectural features. Oak further alleges that eyewitness accounts of the Taj Mahal's construction as well as Shah Jahan's construction orders and voluminous financial records are elaborate frauds meant to hide its Hindu origin.
P. S. Bhat and A. L. Athawale write in the Itihas Patrika, a publication of the Institute for Rewriting Indian History, in support of Oak, saying his writings "place in perspective some of the pertinent questions that arise on the subject".[११]
[संपादित करें] Legal action
साँचा:Refimprovesect Oak petitioned demanding that the Taj be declared a Hindu monument and that cenotaphs and sealed apartments be opened to determine whether Shivalingam or other temple remains were hidden in them.[६] According to Oak, the Indian government's refusal to allow him unfettered access amounts to a conspiracy against Hinduism.
In 2000 India's Supreme Court dismissed Oak's petition to declare that a Hindu king had built the Taj Mahal and reprimanded him for bringing the action, saying he had a "bee in his bonnet" about the Taj.
In 2005 a similar petition was dismissed by the Allahabad High Court. This case was brought by Amar Nath Mishra, a social worker and preacher who says that the Taj Mahal was built by the Hindu King Parmar Dev in 1196.
[संपादित करें] Hindu origins of Islam and Chistianity
Contrary to their accepted histories, Oak claims that both Islam and Christianity originated as distortions of Vedic beliefs, proposing novel etymologies of Islamic and Christian terms (eg. that Islam derives from Sanskrit "Ishalayam" meaning 'temple of God', contradicting the accepted etymology) and identifying similarities between Hindu and Islamic or Christian customs in support of his view.
He alleges that the Kaaba in Mecca was originally a shrine to Shiva[१२] and that the Papacy was "a Vedic priesthood" until Constantine the Great killed the "Vedic Pope" and replaced him with the head of the hitherto unimportant Christian sect.[१३]
The South African Young Men's Muslim Association published an article written by the Mujlisul Ulama, a council of Islamic scholars, to refute Oak's Islam thesis.[१४]
[संपादित करें] Bibliography
- Christianity is Chrisn-nity,
- Islamic Havoc in India (A. Ghosh Publisher, 5740 W. Little York, Houston, Texas, 77091)
- The Taj Mahal Is a Temple Place (Alternate title, The Taj Mahal is a Hindu Palace, Hindi Sahitya Sadan, New Delhi)
- Who Says Akbar Was Great? (Hindi Sahitya Sadan, New Delhi)
- Agra Red Fort is a Hindu Building (Hindi Sahitya Sadan, New Delhi)
- Some Blunders of Indian Historical Research (Hindi Sahitya Sadan, New Delhi)
- Some Missing Chapters of World History (Hindi Sahitya Sadan, New Delhi)
- World Vedic Heritage -- A History of Histories (Hindi Sahitya Sadan, New Delhi)
- Taj Mahal — The True Story (ISBN 0-9611614-4-2)
[संपादित करें] Notes
- ↑ Oak's account of his own life
- ↑ Narasimhan Ram, editor of The Hindu newspaper, calls him a "Sangh historian" HRD Ministry - its master's voice, The Hindu, April 29, 2001.
- ↑ Akbar S. Ahmed। “The Taj Mahal”, History Today, vol. 43, May 1993।
- ↑ The Quest for the Origins of Vedic Culture: The Indo-Aryan Migration Debate, Edwin Bryant, 2003
- ↑ Rebecca Brown, Lagaan: Once Upon a Time in India Film & History: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Film and Television Studies 34.1 (2004) 78-80
- ↑ ६.० ६.१ The Tajmahal is Tejomahalay—A Hindu Temple
- ↑ Cities And Regions Since
- ↑ Carl W. Ernst, Annemarie Schimmel (1992)। Eternal Garden: Mysticism, History, and Politics at a South Asian Sufi Center। State University of New York Press, 36।
- ↑ OUTSIDER AS ENEMY: POLITICS OF REWRTING HISTORY IN INDIA, address to the Stanford India Association. Text available on the Internet Archives
- ↑ Raychaudhuri, T. (2000). "Shadows of the Swastika: Historical Perspectives on the Politics of Hindu Communalism". Modern Asian Studies 34 (02): 259-279. DOI:10.1017/S0026749X00003310.
- ↑ "The question of The Taj" in "Itihas Patrika, Vol. 5 1985"
- ↑ Was the Kaaba Originally a Hindu Temple? by P.N. Oak
- ↑ Oak, P.N., “Cities And Regions Since”, Vaishnava News Network, 1999-06-04।
- ↑ Mujlisul Ulema (Port Elizabeth), P.N. Oak's blasphemy against the Ka`bah, Young Men's Muslim Association, South Africa, archived text
[संपादित करें] External links
- The Taj Mahal Is A Temple Palace - read it online
- Purushottam Nagesh Oak on Taj Mahal
- Taj: A Vedic temple
- Kaaba a Hindu Temple? - article by P. N. Oak
- The question of the Taj Mahal
- Purushottam Nagesh Oak on Hindunet: [1], [2], [3]
- Vir Sanghvi on Purushottam Nagesh Oak
[संपादित करें] See also
Taj Mahal: The True Story
