User talk:Philip Stevens/Archive 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive
Archives
1

Welcome!

Hello, Philip Stevens/Archive 1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, you can post to the help desk or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! - CHAIRBOY (☎) 17:10, 7 September 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Steve Barron

I was reading the page for Steve Barron and I had to do some changes, so I thought to let you know why I did that. Steven Barron did not made his directing debut on "Billie Jean" on 1983, he had done almost 30 music videos before that, making his debut in 1979. --L.a.m.b 15:27, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] James Callaghan

Hi, I reverted to the old infobox as I felt the new box was really too invasive to the page. Arniep 16:25, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Jesus

Check out the Jesus article and edit it to keep it focused on Jesus and a biographical account of Him. Watch the Jesus page to keep it focused on Him. Thank you. Scifiintel 22:17, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Your changes at The West Wing

Thanks for coming to edit at the Wiki. We hope you like it here. Regarding your changes at The West Wing, they are not wholly correct. I just wanted to clarify why I made the revert. You changed divisible by 4 to leap year in the section about when elections are held in the real world. This is not accurate because occasionally (like in the year 1900 or 2100) a year divisible by 4 is not a leap year. Thank you for reading over the article! -Scm83x 11:42, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Have I got news for you cats

Hi, I have asked for these to be listified on Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2005 December 18 as I don't think it is practical to have categories for every tv/radio programme or film people may have appeared on. Thanks Arniep 02:01, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Come and vote your mind

Dear Christian friend,

I saw you on the list of Christian Wikipedians and wanted to let you know about something. The other day, someone nominated 12 Christian biography entries for deletion! They include a Christian university list of people (not unlike 68 other lists like it)[1], presidents of universities, and authors of many books.

Since that time, people have been voting. Please take this message as a call to vote; not a call to vote a certain way. I respect you and your ability to come, read the entry, and make a wise decision. In other words, I’m not vote stacking or campaigning; simply letting you know something that you’d probably like to know.

By the way, my friend recently started an organization called Wiki4Christ. If you’d like to join a network of Christians with a purpose on Wikipedia, please see the site!

Below are some of the links that need attention. Thanks for your consideration.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_Louisiana_Baptist_University_people_%28second_nomination%29

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Neal_Weaver

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jimmy_DeYoung

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/James_Combs

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Robert_Morey

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Daniel_Dorim_Kim

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/J._Otis_Ledbetter

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ron_Moseley

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mike_Randall

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Charles_Pack

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mal_Couch

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Thomas_Ice

God bless you, Wiggins2 07:15, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging Image:John_Major.jpg

Warning sign
This image may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:John_Major.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --OrphanBot 02:54, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Leaders of the Liberal Democrats

Hello Philip: Just to say I've taken the libery of renaming your Template:Liberal Democrats Leaders to the title you use within the template, i.e. Template:Leaders of the Liberal Democrats. Hope you don't mind. Thanks for your excellent work in creating and distributing it.
Best wishes, David Kernow 20:37, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

  • I don’t mind at all and thank you for the compliment. Philip Stevens 11:13, 27 January 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Thank You!

I just wanted to thank you for helping me to correct a category on my usage page.  :) Elizabeth 21:56, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging Image:Calculon.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Calculon.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. -- Carnildo 10:06, 4 February 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Image Tagging Image:USS Enterprise (NCC-1701-J).jpg

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:USS Enterprise (NCC-1701-J).jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — THOR =/\= 04:23, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging Image:Steve_Barron_1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Steve_Barron_1.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. -- Carnildo 20:08, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging Image:UK Royal Coat of Arms B&W.jpg

I'm pretty sure that that particular version of the Royal Arms falls under the fair use rather than PD part of the coa-fair use tag--iirc there are peculiar restrictions on govt versions of the arms. My main note is at Image talk:UK Royal Coat of Arms B&W.jpg. Greentubing 03:48, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:David Cameron 2005.jpg

Hi, unfortunately we can't use this image as no images from press agencies are permitted. Promo images can only be released by a person, their agent or employer, not a press agency . Regards Arniep 17:33, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thank you!!

I saw, just now, that you moved my user page to the correct (US) location! I feel stupid for the mistake, but greatful for the nice note left by you. Thank you. Cpswarrior 15:25, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging for Image:David_Cameron.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:David_Cameron.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as {{db-unksource}}.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo. 08:18, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Request for edit summary

Hi. I am a bot, and I am writing to you with a request. I would like to ask you, if possible, to use edit summaries a bit more often when you contribute. The reason an edit summary is important is because it allows your fellow contributors to understand what you changed; you can think of it as the "Subject:" line in an email. For your information, your current edit summary usage is 13% for major edits and 2% for minor edits. (Based on the last 150 major and 150 minor edits in the article namespace.)

This is just a suggestion, and I hope that I did not appear impolite. You do not need to reply to this message, but if you would like to give me feedback, you can do so at the feedback page. Thank you, and happy edits, Mathbot 18:30, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] other calendars

Nice job with Template:Different calendars. The old prose scheme was unworkable. —Steve Summit (talk) 17:31, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Dominion (Star Trek).png

Thanks for uploading Image:Dominion (Star Trek).png. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Shyam (T/C) 21:22, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Template:Star Trek character

I have restored the 300px size however I added a new optional paramenter which allows one to imput image size. I intend to make all images at least 300px on the long run. --Cool CatTalk|@ 14:59, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] TfD nomination of Template:ST character

Template:ST character has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Philip Stevens 11:48, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

It shall be done. --Cool CatTalk|@ 15:45, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hindu calendar eras

Hi; I've got a suggestion for improving your Template:Different calendars. It concerns the "Hindu calendar", which is really a number of different regional calendars following similar principles and terminology. Specifically, I think different eras besides Kali Yuga should be included: I'd appreciate it if you could look at my proposal and say what you think. Best, QuartierLatin1968 El bien mas preciado es la libertad 00:24, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks man. You rock! QuartierLatin1968 El bien mas preciado es la libertad 20:14, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Richard III; British or English?

Just out of curiousity, why the change to 'English monarchs' category? Candle-ends 17:16, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Would that be 'only ruled over England and Wales'? And I think Ireland was technically (if insecurely) in English hands at that time, too. Candle-ends 19:06, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

  • During the Kingdom of England Wales was classed as part of England and to some extent still is. Those who were also monarchs of Ireland are indicated with a ‡. Philip Stevens 19:22, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Ah, I see. Sorry - I should have looked at the Kingdom of England link first Candle-ends 19:28, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Saint Richard Gwyn

Good work on the photo there, Philip - where on earth is it from? I've never seen it before! It's certainly very different to any I've seen of him before: still, good work.

Is there anything you feel is lacking in the article (particularly the Incident of the Birds section - I'm not entirely sure it makes total sense)?

Your old school friend

Dave

Yeah, that's a pretty good template you have there. I haven't done much editing and creation, other than the 2 Richard Gwyn ones and most of Oxford University Labour Club...I keep meaning to, but it's just a bit of a pain in the arse. Oxymoron 13:40, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Template:Katie Melua

I don't know if you're aware, but Template:Katie Melua, that I created to easily navigate through Katie Melua's music, has been put up for deletion. If you believe that it's useful and needed please vote to keep it. Thank you. Hera1187 08:08, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Template:Christian Democracy

What is the point of your recent edit at Template:Christian Democracy?    GUÐSÞEGN   – UTEX – 16:04, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Quark_(Star_Trek).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Quark_(Star_Trek).jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:40, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Romano Prodi

Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, that's why I removed that infobox. It is not sure Prodi will be appointed as new Prime Minister, especially if the Senate, which has a very narrow majority of the centre-left, should either elect a president different than the centre-left candidate or refuse a vote of confidence on Prodi. I wouldn't be so sure of that, so it's much better to wait for the events yet to come. --Angelo 19:03, 25 April 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Image Tagging Image:Jamie Cullum 1.jpg

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Jamie Cullum 1.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Johnleemk | Talk 16:52, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Please re-edit

You added to the Pope Benedict XVI article after it was vandalized. I reverted it to a previous version to recover from the vandalism, and your edit was lost. You'll want to revisit that article. Thanks. --Kbh3rdtalk 21:39, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Coptic popes template

Sorry about that, thanks for the fix up. :-) Netscott 09:57, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thiago

Good catch re the casing! I sort of thought i was one of the few who appreciated that issue, but they're obviously not so few as i thot, and i'm not as thoroly one as i thot. Thanks.
--Jerzy•t 11:55, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] infobox band

Hi - you recently made some pretty drastic changes to infobox_band that have been reverted. It seems curious why you added fields clearly intended for a solo artist into a template entitled "infobox band". Perhaps {{Infobox musical artist}} is what you're looking for? Regards, DJR (talk) 19:10, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] {{Current UK MP}}

Um, has there been a discussion about adding this rather large template to the articles on all of the MPs? There are some dissenting voices at Template talk:Current UK MP... -- ALoan (Talk) 17:01, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Rachel Garrett

When you cleaned up the article on Rachel Garrett, you added 2332 as the year that she took command of the USS Enterprise NCC-1701-C. I was hoping you could remember the source of this information? —MJBurrage • TALK • 23:40, 26 June 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Serenity 2005.jpg)

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Serenity 2005.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 15:31, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Ff_jayne.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ff_jayne.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:40, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Famous sufferers

Hi Philip, I've removed famous sufferers from Crohn's disease. The relevant discussion is at Talk:Crohn's disease#Famous sufferers. Thanks -- Samir धर्म 17:46, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Michael Foot.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Michael Foot.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:08, 2 August 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Unspecified source for Image:David Bengurion.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:David Bengurion.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jkelly 02:08, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Category sort key

Is it actually case sensitive? [2] [3] [4] How do you know? 128.250.37.103 09:28, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for ignoring my question. :/ 128.250.37.103 11:05, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
Ooops, I'm sorry! I guess another IP user must have caught it, not me. Apologies. 128.250.37.103 11:16, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Template:Infobox British Royalty

Template:Infobox British Royalty has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. --Bob 18:47, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] British Royalty

British Royalty Philip Stevens/Archive 1, WikiProject British Royalty wants you!
WikiProject British Royalty is an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to British royalty on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you should visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
DBD 14:48, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Soyuz patch

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Soyuz-TMA-9-patch.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Soyuz-TMA-9-patch.gif. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Hektor 05:11, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Philipp, you don't have the right, to use the Logo. It comes from www.spacefacts, and you have no permission. Eastfrisian 18:23, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Albert II of Monaco

Why did you change Albert II's investiture to coronation? In Monaco the enthronement ceromony is an investiture, Albert II wasn't crowned. GoodDay 22:11, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

  • I realise that, but there wasn't a coronation field on Template:Infobox Monarch and coronation was the closest equivalent. I have now added an investiture field for the Princes of Monaco. Philip Stevens 06:01, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Current spaceflight

I think the tag {{Current spaceflight}} is for pages on spaceflight which are being edited very frequently (every few minutes) because they are currently headline news. I don't think old missions like Voyager and Hubble qualify. Rnt20 08:39, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

  • On the page it says it's for "highly notable unmanned missions." Philip Stevens 09:06, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Brock Peters.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Brock Peters.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. YellowDot 15:48, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vote on your nomination

You should vote on your RM nomination at Jack Straw (politician). I'm not sure the nominator is always counted otherwise. —  AjaxSmack  01:45, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Incumbent

I just thought you might want to take another look at the definition of incumbent. As it is used in the articles you changed, it was used correctly. The incumbent, in politics, is the current holder of a political office. . The incumbent doesn't have to be available for reelection. A few definitons AuburnPilotTalk 16:28, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

  • My mistake. Though the term "Incumbent" for a nomination of an election that has past just didn't look right. Philip Stevens 16:30, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your millennium boxes

You're supposed to propose broad changes to the Century articles on Wikipedia:Timeline standards. --Sean Brunnock 12:23, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] BRoy Style Guide

I've just created a proposal for our Style Guide - HERE - please do discuss it on the talk page // DBD 12:55, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Talk:Dunyazad

Hi! First of all, whoever categorized it under Arabic is wrong! It's Persian and if you take a look at the article, you will notice it has been done already, in Persian. --Anas Salloum 19:20, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:The Sun (6-Sep-2006).jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:The Sun (6-Sep-2006).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. Arniep 15:00, 24 October 2006 (UTC) -- Arniep 15:00, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thankyou, Stars

The reason you gave for nominating Thankyou, Stars for speedy deletion isn't a speedy deletion criterion; see WP:CSD. I've redirected the page to Piece by Piece (album). Extraordinary Machine 21:41, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

  • Thanks, I should have checked. Philip Stevens 05:37, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 November 3#Infobox Roman emperor

Please see my reply there. User|Neddyseagoon 14:03, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Template:Infobox Officeholder

Hi Philip,

Your edits to this template are coursing problems for all the pages of incumbents. This is especially apparent on Romano Prodi where the dates are all bunched up on one side and it says he is the incumbent President of the European Commission, when he isn't. Thank up. Philip Stevens 16:34, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Yes, have reverted self for time being. Incidentally, noticed anything else...?  Regards, David Kernow (talk) 16:38, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

...Hopefully all still functioning correctly and you approve of the <hr>s added in effort to improve template comprehension. Regards, David (talk) 17:19, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

No apparent problem with either of those articles here; try a purge / wait for anyone else's report...?  Hopefully, David (talk) 18:10, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • I can see a problem. On Romano Prodi, it says "Incumbent" for President of the European Commission, when he isn't and the dates for the time he was EU President have disappeared. For José Manuel Durão Barroso, it doesn't say he is the incumbent President of the European Commission, which he is, and the dates are there but show both "In office" and "In office since". Philip Stevens 18:15, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Looks like a single "2" was missing from the code; does all look in order now...?  David (talk) 19:44, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • They both look fine now. Thank you. Philip Stevens 19:46, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for spotting the problem!  I was thinking the office titles "Nth Leader of Somewhere" looked a bit lost amongst the other information, so maybe they would benefit from (say) a slightly different background... What do you reckon...?  Thanks again, David (talk) 19:54, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • I agree, it's often difficult to pick out the order... I think it would be best to start a discussion on the template's talk page...
Have begun this thread accordingly. Yours, David (talk) 20:42, 6 November 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Image:11 Downing Street.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:11 Downing Street.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 20:52, 31 December 2006 (UTC)