Talk:Pharyngula

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Accuracy

What seems to be wrong with the controversy section? Lizz612 16:08, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

This is a cornerstone of creationist attacks on evolution. The wording of the paragraph probably could be considerably improved, IMHO.--Filll 16:13, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

See http://www.pandasthumb.org/archives/2006/08/the_politically_3.html -- AnonMoos (talk) 12:15, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

The Richardson article refered to which questions the validity of the phayngula stage is published in a peer reviewed journal. It's certainly not creationist propaganda. However, there are some serious critics of this work. PZ Myers, author of the blog pharyngula has some strong arguments against Richardson's work. These are linked to in external links on the page. Perhaps balance would be clearer if these links were moved into the Controversy section? Djs93 (talk) 17:34, 2 January 2008 (UTC)