Talk:Phantom Entertainment
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale. | |
| Mid | This article is on a subject of mid priority within gaming for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0. | |
|
VG To-do:
|
||
Contents |
[edit] Lawsuits
I'm trying to find the article reference for all the judgments against them from CDW and the like...anyone who finds it before me post it, please. Very relevant. Daemon8666 17:03, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
- Found the link; http://www.curbwatcher.com/dasblogce/ If anyone can work this into the article please do; I won't be able to for a while yet.Daemon8666 17:13, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Call that a reference?!
Regarding the [Phantom_Entertainment#Internet_Spamming_Allegations|Internet_Spamming_Allegations] section; I notice it gives [this] as a reference. Basically, it's a search on the "news.admin.net-abuse.sightings" group for the expression "infinium labs". In other words, "here's a canned search for stuff some arbitrary people reported, there might be something plausible here".
Does anyone think that this is a proper reference? I don't.
I'm not opposed to Google groups/Usenet postings being cited as references; the same criteria of reliability and notability of the person applies, though. Even a search can serve as evidence; but only if its purpose is made very clear. Fourohfour 00:52, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- I think it's telling that this very talk page was spammed with a Phantom ad. Atamasama 18:30, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] What happened to the Infinium Labs entry
Who deleted the original article? There was some info in there that just got trashed. Now this crap page just lists lawsuits instead of a history. What happened?
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Phantom-Entertainment-logo.jpg
Image:Phantom-Entertainment-logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:18, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
- I added fair use rationale per the Logo guidelines. -Atamasama 16:42, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
