User talk:209.209.140.19

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 209.209.140.19, is registered to Wispnet, and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block may be shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user. Alternatively, you can list the IP at Wikipedia:WikiProject on XFFs.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

This warning is BS I have never visited several of these pages linked here you are full of it and I know the situation with W10BM YOU DO NOT !!! SLANDER comes at a price you may not even notice...

Please do NOT make legal threats, noone likes them and you'll probably get blocked if you keep them up. As to your editing pages, many people on your ISP use this address, so the comments are directed mostly at them. 68.39.174.238 19:59, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
yeah it looks like several folks edit from this # so the "warnings" should be accurate and not shallow, That did not sound like a legal threat but more spiritual, the lack of understanding that speaks volumns dont it?


Your change to the page Hacker was determined to be unhelpful, and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. Thanks. - Ichiro (会話|+|投稿記録|メール) 02:51, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed content from Somerset, Kentucky. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Dina 14:04, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. Hagerman 21:53, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's NPOV policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Wii, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Furthermore, reinserting the same commentary multiple times may cause you to violate the three-revert rule, which can lead to a block. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 21:59, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to W10BM, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Scienceman123 03:15, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Your edit to Shay

Thank you for experimenting with the page Shay on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. TerriersFan 22:00, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's NPOV rule by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to National Alliance on Mental Illness, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Kungfu Adam (talk) 02:04, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Deletion requests on Augusta high schools

Hi, and thank you for flagging your interest in this area. I note that you used the proposed deletion templates to attempt to have the articles removed on the basis that the school district has requested their removal. Unfortunately, this is not a valid ground for deleting an article on Wikipedia. If a particular section is contentious, as one of your edits suggested, it may be worth your while to attempt to edit or remove the offending section, or raise it for discussion on the article's talk page (under "Discussion" at the top). If you wish to have an article deleted, the best forum is Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. This, in line with Wikipedia policy, subjects the proposed deletion to an open debate and reaches a consensus on what to do with the article. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on my talk page. Orderinchaos78 16:15, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Heavy metal slang

Hello, someone using this IP has recently edited the article Heavy metal slang. While the edit was minor, the edit summary was very clear. It would maybe be better that the person who edited under this IP gets an account, so that he/she does not have to be associated with vandal edits or mistaken for a vandal. ^^

Zouavman Le Zouave 01:07, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Saints Row, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. κaτaʟavenoTC 01:10, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] October 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Abraham Baldwin. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. JForget 01:06, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Ferdinand Magellan, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. This is especially important when dealing with biographies of living people, but applies to all Wikipedia articles. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Thank you. -- Donald Albury 00:18, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for a period of time. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.Kukini hablame aqui 07:13, 30 November 2007 (UTC)