User talk:208.127.154.159

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] December 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Roy Gillaspie, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Roy Gillaspie was changed by 208.127.154.159 (c) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2007-12-10T11:51:20+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 11:51, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Roy Gillaspie. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. E Wing (talk) 11:56, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] December 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Arnold Murray, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Arnold Murray was changed by 208.127.154.159 (c) (t) deleting 12723 characters on 2007-12-24T20:53:03+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 00:53, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Arnold Murray, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Arnold Murray was changed by 208.127.154.159 (c) (t) deleting 10016 characters on 2008-01-04T09:01:14+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 09:01, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Arnold Murray, without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Dan LeveilleTALK 04:06, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Do not remove content from wikipedia articles without valid claims, such as you did on Arnold Murray. You have been constantly removing content without any valid references. The information you have been removing has been referenced. please provide references on why you think the stated references are invalid. Rather than deleting content, please discuss it first on the talk page. I have undone your edits. --Dan LeveilleTALK 04:06, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

I'm asking you again to stop removing content from Arnold Murray without factual claims. You are removing referenced material, so please provide references on why you think the stated references are invalid. Provide me with references on why the information is not valid. If you think information is inaccurate, don't remove it. Find a reference on why it's inaccurate, and post it on Talk:Arnold Murray. I'm going to give you time for you to find references and post it there. If you do not, I will revert your edits again. Do not revert edits after this unless you can provide references. Otherwise, you will be reported. I strongly encourage you to make an account on WP. --Dan LeveilleTALK 04:22, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Roy Gillaspie, you will be blocked from editing. Dan LeveilleTALK 04:39, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Arnold Murray, you will be blocked from editing. Please discuss information before you remove it. The information you have been removing has been referenced. Dan LeveilleTALK 04:54, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Arnold Murray. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Camaron1 | Chris (talk) 19:28, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

If you really feel that strongly about protecting Arnold Murray and if you really have studied his works then you would know that he always says to be smarter than the serpent. Get your own copy of the ministerial license and photoshop out the signatures except the bottom one, upload it, and claim it is the real version.

AM has said many times that the kenites like to twist things just a little bit to change or hide the truth. Either you are a kenite or you are following their tactics.65.87.185.73 (talk) 02:15, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a period of 24 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. —Animum (talk) 02:26, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Arnold Murray

An editor has nominated Arnold Murray, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arnold Murray and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 02:29, 10 January 2008 (UTC)