User talk:206.173.170.67

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Earlier today, this IP posted near identical content on 18seventeen (1) biographical article

...controversial immigration bill which would almost double the number of H1-B visas and is expected to drive down wages in high-tech professions which have already seen employment declines, decreasing salaries and longer working hours. [1]

I am reverting these inappropriate edits as spam, not-neutral, and trivial: these articles can't record every vote a politician makes that upsets someone. I reverted 16fifteen (15), 2 were reverted by others. I left the near identical edit in the H-1B visa article for other editors to consider. -- Paleorthid 17:58, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Looks like another 18 or so similar edits were made. I will revert those as well. --mtz206 (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

I have reverted a recent edit you made to the article Mike DeWine. You did not provide an edit summary, and I could not determine whether the edit was vandalism or a constructive contribution. In the future, please use edit summaries. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. — Brendenhull (T + C) at 21:06, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Regarding Tim Johnson: Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. — Brendenhull (T + C) at 21:19, 1 June 2006 (UTC)


I note the same problem (multiple postings, with the above text about H-1B visas) was done by 71.123.40.76. John Broughton 13:31, 2 June 2006 (UTC)