User talk:205.56.129.195

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 205.56.129.195, is registered to Navy Network Information Center, and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block may be shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user. Alternatively, you can list the IP at Wikipedia:WikiProject on XFFs.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Thanks for experimenting with the page Dulce María on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Where (talk) 03:16, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --—Khoikhoi 16:26, 3 October 2006 (UTC)


Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Maggot . Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Kuru talk 17:48, 18 February 2007 (UTC)


Please stop. If you continue to delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Maggot, you will be blocked. Kuru talk 17:49, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --ROASTYTOAST 21:50, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gdo01 18:00, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gdo01 18:03, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

-- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 18:21, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Snowballing (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 14:39, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] June 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Rapture. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. :) Chetblong 14:05, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] Your edits to Nicholas Sparks

Your edits to the article, Nicholas Sparks, is considered vandalism. If you have any attempts to vandalize any of the articles on Wikipedia, you will be blocked.--Sli723 22:34, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Firsfron of Ronchester 23:07, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Starburst (confectionery), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Starburst (confectionery) was changed by 205.56.129.195 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2007-11-30T04:03:29+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 04:03, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Starburst (confectionery) constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks – Gurch 04:05, 30 November 2007 (UTC))

[edit] December 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to VFA-11, you will be blocked from editing. — ERcheck (talk) 12:29, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Your recent edit to Speed of light (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 15:15, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Unsourced information in United States Navy SEALs

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to United States Navy SEALs, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. This is especially important when dealing with biographies of living people, but applies to all Wikipedia articles. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. . I'm referring to these edits.--Mumia-w-18 (talk) 16:43, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Wind has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Tiddly-Tom 18:30, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Cameron Parish, Louisiana, you will be blocked from editing. - Ricksal0224 (talk) 14:14, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to The Final Countdown (song) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Keilana|Parlez ici 21:39, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Action Park. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Explodicle (talk) 02:44, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.