User talk:212.107.116.246

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] January 2007

  1. Adding unrelated external links to articles is considered vandalism. If you continue to use Wikipedia for advertising, you will be blocked from editing. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Srikeit 09:27, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
  2. Your recent edit to Mercedes-Benz W125 Rekordwagen (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 13:11, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] April 2007

  1. Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Friendship. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policy for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Thank you. Versageek 09:43, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
  2. Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. One or more of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Columbine High School massacre, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. AstroPig7 15:15, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] back street boys

Once again, the data is incorrect. You have referenced 3 sites that are quoting the same source, and as said before, these are forums where the data is disputed. Therefore before changing again, please actually reseach. As I have shown, 30 million is a credible figure for Millennium. Although some say this figure is also inflated. So, let us look at sales figures compared to Millenium. In the USA - the biggest market, Black & Blue sold only 60% of the sales for Millennium [1]. In the 2nd biggest market of the UK, Black & Blue sold only 100,000 copies [2]. This is 30% of what Millenium achieved [3]. Look at Germany, another stronghold for BSB, Millenium sold 200,000 under Roughtrade label, and 300,000 under Zomba label [4], whereas Black and Blue sold 200,000 only [5] = 40%. Another one - Australia. Millennium sold 210,000 whereas Black and Blue sold 70,000 [6]. Again, 30%. You can see that sales for Black & Blue would be closer to 50% of Millennium NOT 80% as your figure of 24 million suggests. I have therefore reverted it. 60.234.242.196 10:50, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

I refer you to the 2001 IFPI Recording Association for 2001 [7]. On page 5 it states that Black & Blue was the 10th biggest chart topping album of the year. If you research the sales for an album that was similar i.e. Madonna's - Music. This sold 13m worldwide (refer links to this on the Madonna Discography discussion page), Red Hot Chili Peppers - Californication has sold 15m to date. [8], Eminem's The Marshall Mathers LP, which did far better than Black and Blue, sold 19m [9] to date. This once again is showing that Black and Blue sales 'are likely' to be in the same vicinity, and NOT 24m. 60.234.242.196 22:20, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
It is impossible for Black and Blue to have sold 24 million. If you can supply a verified link that says 24m, then it can be used. But nobody has been able to - just forums and made up figures. Maggott2000 00:55, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
It does not matter what album. It is not a verifiable source. Maggott2000 08:12, 9 July 2007 (UTC)


[edit] July 2007

  1. Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Maggott2000 23:58, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
  2. Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Maggott2000 10:24, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
  3. Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Gold. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Caltas (talk) 10:28, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
  4. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, 212.107.116.246! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule example\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guidelines for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 18:13, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
  5. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Muslim history, you will be blocked from editing. Caltas (talk) 10:34, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
  6. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Islamic calendar, you will be blocked from editing. Caltas (talk) 10:36, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
  • You have been blocked for a period of 72 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Khukri 11:31, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (film), you will be blocked from editing. Android Mouse 20:00, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our polices concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. TigerShark 20:17, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding your edits to Hedge fund:

Your recent edit to Hedge fund (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 12:30, 11 September 2007 (UTC)


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Hedge fund. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —DerHexer (Talk) 12:30, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to GMA Network, you will be blocked from editing. --- Tito Pao 14:37, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Lebanese cuisine, you will be blocked from editing. Brianga (talk) 22:08, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Due to repeated vandalism, this address is blocked from editing for a period of one month. Kafziel Ask me for rollback 06:39, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Nagar Panchayat has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. ·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 09:30, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to American International School - Riyadh (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 16:20, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Mirza Ghulam Ahmad has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 17:03, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Mirza Ghulam Ahmad. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Nazli (talk) 20:32, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Hilda Khalife has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. AVandtalkcontribs 12:16, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Kenya Television Network, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Kenya Television Network was changed by 212.107.116.246 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-05-17T13:21:46+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 13:21, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Praveen Togadia has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. ♣ẼгíćЏ89♣ (talk) 11:50, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Kargil War. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.  S3000  ☎ 10:45, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.