Template talk:Indent

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Demonstration Vs. {{space}}

[edit] Source 'test lines'

1. I think that the end is near{{indent|15}} but not yet...{{space|10}} but coming soon!
2. Second test line merely reverses the words {indent} with {space}.

[edit] The End is near

1. I think that the end is near

                but not yet...           but coming soon!

1. I think that the end is near                but not yet...

           but coming soon!

[edit] Genesis History

I ported this over from wikisource. Seems useful for when a wikitable is contraindicated, yet one wants to line up several short columns of material. That makes the assumption that it can be used in-line, and does not generate a linefeed. (I'm acting boldly, as it displays poorly as you can see below! FrankB

It appears to be having an unused category here. Displaying with nowikis:

<br />{{ #switch: {{{1}}} | 0 = | 1 =   | 2 =    | 3 =     | 4 =      | 5 =       | 6 =        | 7 =         | 8 =          | 9 =           | 10 =            | 11 =             | 12 =              | 13 =               | 14 =                | 15 =                 | 16 =                  | 17 =                   | 18 =                    | 19 =                     | 20 =                      | 21 =                       | 22 =                        | 23 =                         | 24 =                          | 25 =                           | 26 =                            | 27 =                             | 28 =                              | 29 =                               | 30 =                                | }}<noinclude>[[Category:Uncategorised templates]]</noinclude>

I suggested over there that the category ought to be 'Pretty print' or the like, along the lines of a pretty print program or filter in Computer Science, esp. used in the bad old days for C, C++, etc.

Best regards, FrankB 21:33, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Creation of Variation

Turns out the template initiates a leading newline (linefeed); so I've adapted it to {{space}} which CAN BE USED inline sans the leading newline generation. FrankB 22:13, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Indenting

This doesn't apply to spacing. Why not use the CSS text-indent? — Edward Z. Yang^(Talk) 18:46, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Here's an example:

A lot simpler hmm? — Edward Z. Yang^(Talk) 01:51, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Head to head comparisons indent vs. <p></p>

[edit] Indenting

Postponing third test to save these total adds, prep for 3rd head to head in Preview for first look

... this save creates a browser 'Jumpto Homepage' in IE6, A bug I had asked Interiot to look into at one time.

• (i.e.-the text below when Previewed:
     A) Flashes a 'New page'
     B)Immediately Makes a clicking sound...
     C) Jumps to my default (or signon) homepage. (which just happens to be a wikipage which is irrelevant).

[edit] Test1_doc: <p> and </p> versus {{i}} (indent)

<p>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Cras volutpat porta ante. Mauris dui dolor, vehicula id, elementum a, semper sed, sem.</p><p> Phasellus pretium vestibulum pede. Vestibulum vulputate. Mauris lacinia nonummy ligula. </p><p>Mauris condimentum mattis purus. Morbi ut mi nec purus gravida tincidunt.</p><p>Donec commodo. Sed lectus erat, ultrices id, vestibulum id, egestas eget, tellus. Curabitur scelerisque placerat tortor. </p><p>Phasellus non urna. Quisque euismod, leo in egestas pulvinar, nunc nisl dignissim nisi, sed pulvinar orci elit sed purus. Nullam vitae nisi. Donec sagittis. Praesent a tellus. </p>

Versus

{{i}}Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Cras volutpat porta ante. Mauris dui dolor, vehicula id, elementum a, semper sed, sem.{{i}} Phasellus pretium vestibulum pede. Vestibulum vulputate. Mauris lacinia nonummy ligula. {{i}}Mauris condimentum mattis purus. Morbi ut mi nec purus gravida tincidunt.{{i}}Donec commodo. Sed lectus erat, ultrices id, vestibulum id, egestas eget, tellus. Curabitur scelerisque placerat tortor. {{i}}Phasellus non urna. Quisque euismod, leo in egestas pulvinar, nunc nisl dignissim nisi, sed pulvinar orci elit sed purus. Nullam vitae nisi. Donec sagittis. Praesent a tellus.{{i}}

[edit] Test1: <p> and </p> versus {{i}} (indent)

< >

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Cras volutpat porta ante. Mauris dui dolor, vehicula id, elementum a, semper sed, sem.

Phasellus pretium vestibulum pede. Vestibulum vulputate. Mauris lacinia nonummy ligula.

Mauris condimentum mattis purus. Morbi ut mi nec purus gravida tincidunt.

Donec commodo. Sed lectus erat, ultrices id, vestibulum id, egestas eget, tellus. Curabitur scelerisque placerat tortor.

Phasellus non urna. Quisque euismod, leo in egestas pulvinar, nunc nisl dignissim nisi, sed pulvinar orci elit sed purus. Nullam vitae nisi. Donec sagittis. Praesent a tellus.

</ >

Versus

< >
   Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Cras volutpat porta ante. Mauris dui dolor, vehicula id, elementum a, semper sed, sem.
    Phasellus pretium vestibulum pede. Vestibulum vulputate. Mauris lacinia nonummy ligula.
   Mauris condimentum mattis purus. Morbi ut mi nec purus gravida tincidunt.
   Donec commodo. Sed lectus erat, ultrices id, vestibulum id, egestas eget, tellus. Curabitur scelerisque placerat tortor.
   Phasellus non urna. Quisque euismod, leo in egestas pulvinar, nunc nisl dignissim nisi, sed pulvinar orci elit sed purus. Nullam vitae nisi. Donec sagittis. Praesent a tellus.
    </ >

Quite different in effect

   Let's try another use...

[edit] comparision 2

[edit] Test code

:Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Cras volutpat porta ante. Mauris dui dolor, vehicula id, elementum a, semper sed, sem.</p><p> Phasellus pretium vestibulum pede. Vestibulum vulputate. Mauris lacinia nonummy ligula. </p><p>Mauris condimentum mattis purus. Morbi ut mi nec purus gravida tincidunt.</p><p>Donec commodo. Sed lectus erat, ultrices id, vestibulum id, egestas eget, tellus. Curabitur scelerisque placerat tortor. </p><p>Phasellus non urna. Quisque euismod, leo in egestas pulvinar, nunc nisl dignissim nisi, sed pulvinar orci elit sed purus. Nullam vitae nisi. Donec sagittis. Praesent a tellus. </p> glops

Versus

*Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Cras volutpat porta ante. Mauris dui dolor, vehicula id, elementum a, semper sed, sem.{{i}} Phasellus pretium vestibulum pede. Vestibulum vulputate. Mauris lacinia nonummy ligula. {{i}}Mauris condimentum mattis purus. Morbi ut mi nec purus gravida tincidunt.{{i}}Donec commodo. Sed lectus erat, ultrices id, vestibulum id, egestas eget, tellus. Curabitur scelerisque placerat tortor. {{i}}Phasellus non urna. Quisque euismod, leo in egestas pulvinar, nunc nisl dignissim nisi, sed pulvinar orci elit sed purus. Nullam vitae nisi. Donec sagittis. Praesent a tellus.{{i}} glops

[edit] Test inside wikimarkup indented paragraph

• Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Cras volutpat porta ante. Mauris dui dolor, vehicula id, elementum a, semper sed, sem.

  Phasellus pretium vestibulum pede. Vestibulum vulputate. Mauris lacinia nonummy ligula.

  Mauris condimentum mattis purus. Morbi ut mi nec purus gravida tincidunt.

  Donec commodo. Sed lectus erat, ultrices id, vestibulum id, egestas eget, tellus. Curabitur scelerisque placerat tortor.

  Phasellus non urna. Quisque euismod, leo in egestas pulvinar, nunc nisl dignissim nisi, sed pulvinar orci elit sed purus. Nullam vitae nisi. Donec sagittis. Praesent a tellus.

  </ >glops

Versus

• Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Cras volutpat porta ante. Mauris dui dolor, vehicula id, elementum a, semper sed, sem.
      Phasellus pretium vestibulum pede. Vestibulum vulputate. Mauris lacinia nonummy ligula.
     Mauris condimentum mattis purus. Morbi ut mi nec purus gravida tincidunt.
     Donec commodo. Sed lectus erat, ultrices id, vestibulum id, egestas eget, tellus. Curabitur scelerisque placerat tortor.
     Phasellus non urna. Quisque euismod, leo in egestas pulvinar, nunc nisl dignissim nisi, sed pulvinar orci elit sed purus. Nullam vitae nisi. Donec sagittis. Praesent a tellus.
      </ >glops

occurs when looking at

Head to head comparisons indent vs. <p></p>

[edit] IE6 Previewing error

Versus

[edit] IE6 Error revealed (found?)

Documenting IE6 Bug with save (History-fixing this page)

   I've this comparison to finish for us, Edward Z. Yang!

Aha! Reveals an unbalanced (unclosed) 'nowiki' block -- and a very ugly color choice! FrankB 14

37, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Head to head comparisons indent vs. <p></p>

More documention-IE6 does same hop, skip, jump when trying to section edit this flawed code.

   Making fix(es) and graphic fix ups to intentions (format goal) and save again. (I'm in firefox-btw) // FrankB 14:37, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Save pre-modify to test, and to retest in IE6... is jumpto Error problem cleared??? // FrankB 14:37, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Page as above saved still manifests the jumpto error in IE6, Back to Firefox to finish my discussions with Edward Z. Yang and the comparisons. // FrankB 15:59, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

   (now that I can see the wrap points to select paragraphs):

[edit] H2H Test three

   Note: Both Template:Co (edit talk links history) && {{I}}/Template:I (edit talk links history) unhappy inside Template:Co (edit talk links history).

Versus

[edit] H2H test 4-longer paragraphs

Versus

Some major differences and capabilities, I'd say! Q.E.D. // FrankB 15

59, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Margins in comparison blocks changed from 16 & 18 em to all 8em // FrankB 05

36, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Check of strikethrough inheritance

[edit] Original CFD section listed on large page on 14 FEB 2007

[edit] Category:Roman Catholic Church by country

• Category:Roman Catholicism in Brazil
• Category:Roman Catholicism in Korea
• Category:Roman Catholicism in Norway
• Category:Catholic Church in Thailand

Rename all to Roman Catholic Church in Foo, convention of Category:Roman Catholic Church by country. -- Prove It ^(talk) 05:42, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

• Rename per nom. Osomec 14:53, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
• Rename for consistancy. Coemgenus 19:07, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
• Rename for consistency. Mairi 17:59, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Example/Test of strike through Category:Roman Catholic Church by country

Took just a moment...

[edit] Category:Catholic Church in Thailand

• Category:Roman Catholicism in Brazil
      Category:Roman Catholicism in Korea
      Category:Roman Catholicism in Norway
     This section split from group nomination with those listed above because of objections on this one... FrankB 20:45, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
• Category:Catholic Church in Thailand

Rename all to Roman Catholic Church in Foo, convention of Category:Roman Catholic Church by country. -- Prove It ^(talk) 05:42, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

• Rename per nom. Osomec 14:53, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
• Rename for consistancy. Coemgenus 19:07, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
• Rename for consistency. Mairi 17:59, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

This demo is hereby classed as 'PROOVED' <g>// FrankB 20:45, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] If it's just <br>{{space}}

If the only difference between this and the template space is the line break, then replace the current code with <br>{{space|{{{1}}}}}. Jɪmp 07:15, 21 June 2007 (UTC)