User talk:Accounting4Taste

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Accounting4Taste is currently, or is about to be, on vacation in real life from 8 June 2008 until 15 June 2008 and may not be able to respond immediately to queries. He or she may pop in now and then from an available online source.

Wait! Are you here because your article was speedy deleted? Click here before leaving a message to find out why.

If you're here to discuss a page, it would be appreciated if you would be specific about the name of the page, if possible providing a link to it. Since I, like you, am working to improve Wikipedia, please remember to assume good faith, please add your message to the BOTTOM of the page, and also please remember to sign your posts with ~~~~.

Talk archives
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

I re-read the policy on advertisement and I understand why my article was deleted. However, I would still like to put up a page about Osmocote that is more encyclopedia-like. Do you have any specific suggestions on what I should do? Also, do I need to completely start from scratch? I'm new to writing wikipedia articles. Btowngreenthumb (talk) 17:58, 27 May 2008 (UTC)btowngreenthumb

Contents 1 Cookie Cutter Series 2 Quick question 3 5 card majors 4 Hey 5 Speed eating 6 We have consensus at Barack Obama 7 Bizstar

[edit] Cookie Cutter Series

Don't deny it you know many fantasy novel series' titles follow a similar plot pattern

Look at Pokemon every episode is exactly the same.

---

Fair enough i dont source any references. Doesn't wikipedia have a way to develop new articles though? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Asdt2ewt (talk • contribs) 18:56, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Quick question

Hi. Can you let me know what content was at Christianity/to do? Thanks SP-KP (talk) 10:21, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. The page I'm interested in is the one that used to appear in the To Do box on the Talk Page - I've just not-quite-recreated it (i.e. opened an edit session for it without saving) as an experiment and it seems like I should have asked about Talk:Christianity/to do. Thanks for letting me know about that. Would you have any objection to restoring it (i.e. the Talk page only, not it's associated article-space page?) SP-KP (talk) 16:38, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

I've reverted the restored talk page to the last good version - I'm happy with things, and don't need you to do any more work on this. Many thanks for your help. SP-KP (talk) 17:45, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for that observation - I think we're safe as "to do" pages are a fairly widely-used convention and they don't usually have an article space page (see e.g. Talk:Bird/to do, Talk:Berlin/to do SP-KP (talk) 17:52, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] 5 card majors

Thanks for your observations and advise. I made the move you suggested, and added the first reference. Feel free to add others as you wish. Thanks, mbbradford 19:56, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks again for your kind remarks. With so much bridge information on wk, I was surprised that there was no 5cm article. Perhaps it is just too well known. I'm sure there are better references, and I'll got to them someday. mbbradford 06:49, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hey

hey, recently you deleted my article for klikradio. I was not finished writing it and the organization itself has already been in the local paper. Maybe allowing me to finish it in a sand-box would be easier until I finished.

Thanks, Phillip Ross and Don Park —Preceding unsigned comment added by StarD (talk • contribs) 22:50, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

I'll reply on your talk page. Accounting4Taste:talk 22:55, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speed eating

Answered your messsage on my Talkpage  Channel ®   23:41, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] We have consensus at Barack Obama

... for certain details regarding William Ayers, Jeremiah Wright and Tony Rezko. See Talk:Barack Obama. However, a small but extremely active and dedicated group Obama fanboys are trying to WP:OWN and sanitize the article. Anyone who tries to support WP:NPOV and revert to the consensus version is threatened, called a sockpuppeteer, etc.

First, this has been an ugly situation for some time and more attention from admins is needed. Second, the Obama fanboys need to be brought under control. They do not own the article. WP:NPOV means proportionate representation of all significant POVs. The POV that is questioning Obama about his relationships with Wright, Rezko and Ayers is not a fringe POV. Editors who seek to include that POV in a balanced manner are not "Obama haters," and when they agree with one another, they are not sockpuppets. Please help. Kossack4Truth (talk) 21:52, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Bizstar

I have used the services of Bizstar and as a small business in the UK i found it very useful and feel that many similar business's could benefit from it the way i have, if you check out the site you will see all the features, i can be called at JMB Block Managment 0844 586 3252 if you wish to discuss with me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.31.145.108 (talk) 20:17, 10 June 2008 (UTC)