From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1 Archive 2
[edit] Belzec Anon
Hi Squiddy. It did occur to me that someone might contact me on this issue. I do not seek to explicitly debate the functions of Belzec with anon in question, partly because an article's talk page is obviously for Wikipedia purposes and not for topical discussion, but mostly because it is futile to debate the undebateable. The only reason I have been pursuing the conversation is so that anyone viewing the talk page can read for themselves the false reasoning and methods weaned out of him, and accordingly, why it has no place on Wikipedia. Thank you for your message. Kind regards, WilliamH (talk) 15:17, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
