User talk:Sirex98
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
If I have posted a question on your talk page, I would be appreciative if you would reply there, and vice versa, so as to keep the conversation in one place. Thank you!
 |
The Wikipedia Signpost |
Contents |
[edit] thank spam
 |
Thank you for voting in my RfA, which passed with 194 supporting, 9 opposing, and 4 neutral. Your kindness and constructive criticism is very much appreciated. I look forward to using the tools you have granted me to aid the project. I would like to give special thanks to Tim Vickers, Anthony and Acalamari for their nominations. Thank you again, VanTucky |
[edit] Doyle Brunson
First I would hardly say that iconic is peacock term keep in mind it is a wikipedia guide line not policy. "Peacock" terms are opinionated. Also the policy states "This page documents an English Wikipedia style guideline. It is a generally accepted standard that editors should follow, though it should be treated with common sense and the occasional exception". Is Doyle not an exception? Secondly it has been backed by references third please read: "peacock terms which merely promote the subject of the article without imparting real information". This is clearly not to "promote" the subject. I dont think Doyle needs any promoting. 63.76.234.250 (talk) 16:32, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
- see the Doyle Brunson talk page.▪◦▪≡SiREX≡Talk 17:02, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] edit question from your message
First I wanted to thank you for your message in regards to proper content for the site. I understand the content on Clonie's page could be construed as such but the edits I made on the sports agent section were just editions adhering to the two other examples that were there before i posted. If you could be so kind and let me know how to best proceed I would appreciate it.
Best. t4 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thanks for (talk • contribs) 07:33, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry, but to write in an article "To inquire about securing Clonie for an appearance at your next event please contact her agent, XXXXX at ***@***.com." is advertising and there for forbidden.▪◦▪≡SiREX≡Talk
[edit] advert
No, I totally understand and agree with that and didnt realize that was not allowed on the site. What i was inquiring about was that I updated sports agent and added my name and some of the roster to other poker agents, and the content I added was an identical format to what was already posted.
thanks for the time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thanks for (talk • contribs) 04:33, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry about the late reply, I know this must seem a bit unnerving to you, It's best that you bring up the topic on the talk page being that it's about yourself (because you have a conflict of interest). On the talk page you may wish to show the Notability of yourself why you should be red-linked and because you added the section also the notability of sports agents that 'represent poker players', also see WP:BIO, WP:COMPANY), I don't fellow the topic so the best place is to ask is there, if you don't get a timely response which sometimes happens on an individual Wikipedia talk page, feel free to ask at the help desk, thank you. ▪◦▪≡SiREX≡Talk 15:50, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] 2008 WSOP
Another World Series of Poker underway...you going to be editing much? I'll try my best to make sure things stay up to date. Been out of the loops with the poker around here lately. Stsharp413 (talk) 20:58, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Favor
I know you suggested in the past I get a commons account to move the images I have uploaded to commons but I have been unable to do so recently due to conflicting issues. Could you possibly move my images (and in addition the images of Creet (talk · contribs)) to commons and I will delete my own images once the move has been completed? –– Lid(Talk) 08:30, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
- I'll do a few here and there when I have extra time.▪◦▪≡SiREX≡Talk 09:25, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
